1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4820-7_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Solar Composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
206
5
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
14
206
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have calculated them for the Grevesse and Sauval (1998) as well as for the Asplund et al (2005) new solar composition. We use standard MLT and FTS convection theory, and employ OPAL and Irwin-EOS.…”
Section: The Garsom Standard Solar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have calculated them for the Grevesse and Sauval (1998) as well as for the Asplund et al (2005) new solar composition. We use standard MLT and FTS convection theory, and employ OPAL and Irwin-EOS.…”
Section: The Garsom Standard Solar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the standard photospheric solar abundances 16 we obtain the metallicity of these elements as [ (cm 22 )] < 21.3 is assumed from a damped Lya system model for the Lya damping wing presented below. These values may not represent the typical abundances in the GRB host galaxy for several reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more recent Solar abundance determinations of O, Ne, and Fe by Lodders (2003) are ∼30% lower than those given by Anders and Grevesse (1989). The Solar abundances of O and Ne reported by Grevesse and Sauval (1998) are higher and the abundance of Fe is slightly lower than those reported by Lodders (2003).…”
Section: What Chemical Abundance Measurements Tell Usmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Dupke and White (2000) and Dupke and Arnaud (2001) used the Ni/Fe ratio measured in clusters by ASCA to distinguish between the SN Ia models assuming slow deflagration and delayed detonation. While the deflagration explosion mechanism of SN Ia (represented by the W7 and W70 models in the literature, Iwamoto et al 1999) predicts high Ni/Fe ratio of 2.18-3.22 in the Solar units of Grevesse and Sauval (1998), the delayed-detonation explosion scenarios predict significantly lower Ni/Fe ratios of 0.9-1.4 Solar. They are represented by the WDD1, WDD2, WDD3, CDD1, and CDD2 models in the literature, where the last digit indicates the density at which the flame velocity becomes supersonic (deflagration-to-detonation transition density) in units of 10 7 g cm −3 ; the "C" and "W" refer to two different central densities (1.37 × 10 9 and 2.12 × 10 9 g cm −3 , respectively) in the model at the onset of the thermonuclear runaway (Iwamoto et al 1999).…”
Section: Constraining Supernova Models Using Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%