1975
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-197507000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Sources for Health Physics Instrument Calibration

Abstract: A basic review of radioactive and machine sources of ionizing radiation useful for health physics instrument calibration, with particular emphasis on the needs of the applied health physicist. Topics considered include standards terminology and hierarchy; alpha, beta, electromagnetic and neutron sources; and accuracy limits under laboratory and field conditions. Detailed characteristics of common sources and their salient physical characteristics are tabulated. TOWARDS A MORE EXACT TERMINOLOGY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current practices for instrument ca 1 i brati on with an uranium slab require placement of the survey instrument with its window in contact with the slab. Beta dose rates are constant only for a few millimeters above the slab surface (Kathren 1975) and fall off to only 4% of their surface value at 10 em from the slab. Unless the detector's sensitive 18 • • • • • volume is only a few millimeters deep~ the radiation field in the sensitive volume will not be uniform.…”
Section: Ideal Beta Dosimetermentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current practices for instrument ca 1 i brati on with an uranium slab require placement of the survey instrument with its window in contact with the slab. Beta dose rates are constant only for a few millimeters above the slab surface (Kathren 1975) and fall off to only 4% of their surface value at 10 em from the slab. Unless the detector's sensitive 18 • • • • • volume is only a few millimeters deep~ the radiation field in the sensitive volume will not be uniform.…”
Section: Ideal Beta Dosimetermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One further problem is that the uranium slab emits gamma radiation as well as beta radiation. This contributes about 10% of the dose rate at the surface of the uranium slab and increases to approximately 20% at 10 em (Kathren 1975). Because of this nonuniform photon contribution, accurate compensation factors are difficult to determine, and in most cases none have been made.…”
Section: Ideal Beta Dosimetermentioning
confidence: 99%