2020
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009528.pub5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard versus biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of antibiotic required to achieve 3 log 10 killing of EVPL-grown bacteria is often significantly higher than the MIC or the MBEC calculated from standard in vitro assays, even when SCFM is used for these assays (Figure 3). This is consistent with a Cochrane review that reported that current implementations of in vitro biofilm susceptibility testing do not provide any increased predictive power for antibiotic prescribing in CF compared to standard susceptibility testing 16 .…”
Section: Representative Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of antibiotic required to achieve 3 log 10 killing of EVPL-grown bacteria is often significantly higher than the MIC or the MBEC calculated from standard in vitro assays, even when SCFM is used for these assays (Figure 3). This is consistent with a Cochrane review that reported that current implementations of in vitro biofilm susceptibility testing do not provide any increased predictive power for antibiotic prescribing in CF compared to standard susceptibility testing 16 .…”
Section: Representative Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…the Calgary biofilm device, which uses biofilms grown on the surface of plastic pegs set within the wells of a microplate containing standard AST medium (e.g., cationadjusted Muller-Hinton broth) 14 , 15 . This assay does no better at predicting which antibiotics will work in vivo than standard planktonic AST 16 . The impact on patients with CF is stark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most if not all of the described host and microbial factors are absent in conventional AST, and the biofilm phenotype and phenotypic diversity of P. aeruginosa observed in vivo, are not captured. Nevertheless, clinical studies focusing on biofilm susceptibility to guide antibiotic therapy did not show an improvement in P. aeruginosa density in sputum or lung function parameters compared with conventional AST [175]. Hence, mimicking the biofilm phenotype alone may not be sufficient to fill the gap between in vitro and in vivo antibiotic susceptibility.…”
Section: Mediators Of the Immune Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Make a final cross-sectional incision across the bronchiole before any branching is visible to remove the bronchiole from the lungs. 16. Place the bronchiole in the first DMEM/RPMI 1640 wash.…”
Section: Dissection and Infection Of Ex Vivo Pig Lung (Evpl) Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%