2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-018-2136-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard zero-free regions for Rankin–Selberg L-functions via sieve theory

Abstract: We give a simple proof of a standard zero-free region in the t-aspect for the Rankin-Selberg L-function L(s, π × π) for any unitary cuspidal automorphic representation π of GL n (A F ) that is tempered at every nonarchimedean place outside a set of Dirichlet density zero.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given π ∈ F n and π ′ ∈ F n ′ , let L(s, π × π ′ ) be the associated Rankin-Selberg L-function, and let π ∈ F n and π ′ ∈ F n ′ be the contragredient representations. When π ′ ∈ { π, π ′ }, work of Brumley [29,Appendix] and the authors [30] shows that there exists an absolute and effectively computable constant c 1 > 0 such that L(s, π × π ′ ) has a "standard" zero-free region of the shape…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given π ∈ F n and π ′ ∈ F n ′ , let L(s, π × π ′ ) be the associated Rankin-Selberg L-function, and let π ∈ F n and π ′ ∈ F n ′ be the contragredient representations. When π ′ ∈ { π, π ′ }, work of Brumley [29,Appendix] and the authors [30] shows that there exists an absolute and effectively computable constant c 1 > 0 such that L(s, π × π ′ ) has a "standard" zero-free region of the shape…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If π ′ ∈ { π, π ′ }, then L(s, π × π ′ ) has the standard zero-free region (1.1) apart from a possible Landau-Siegel zero, which must be both real and simple. In all other cases, it follows from work of Brumley (see [8], [29,Section 1], and [41,Appendix]) that there exists an absolute and effectively computable constant c 2 > 0 such that L(s, π × π ′ ) = 0 in the much narrower region (2.1) Re(s)…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and by the bounds for 1 ( ), 2 ( ) given in (7.0.12), P 2,2 ,Φ ( , 1, 1), = Note that the bound for the case that |Im( 1 )| is small involves the non-existence of Siegel zeros that is proved in [HR95] while the case when |Im( 1 )| is large was first proved in [Mor85]. See also [GL18], [HB19]. Applying these bounds, the Theorem 7.0.3 bound, together with Stirling's bound to estimate the integral in 1 , we find, as claimed, that…”
Section: Bounding the Contribution From The Continuous Spectrummentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such a uniform bound is known to be a consequence of the Rankin–Selberg theory. However, it is apparent that the first proof of this fact in the literature is given by Brumley [, Lemma A.2]. Also, we do require the bound of the Rankin–Selberg conductors Aπtrueπ̌χ established by Bushnell and Henniart .…”
Section: Applications To Automorphic L‐functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To end this section, we further remark that the prime number theorem and log‐free zero‐density estimates for automorphic L‐functions have been studied in . Moreover, it is possible to obtain the error terms for the above estimates by invoking the zero‐free regions of the Rankin–Selberg L‐functions (see, e.g., ).…”
Section: Applications To Automorphic L‐functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%