2001
DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardisation and Calibration Transfer for near Infrared Instruments: A Review

Abstract: Transferring calibrations between near infrared instruments is not always straightforward, even when the instruments are nominally the same. Problems can include both wavelength shifts and differences in absorbance response between instruments. This review describes a number of chemometric methods that have been developed to aid calibration transfer. The approaches are classified under three headings: making robust calibrations, adjusting calibrations and adjusting spectra. Calibrations can be made more robust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
184
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
184
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the main challenge is to find a method to align laboratory and remote spectral data [45,60]. Many issues need to be addressed for this goal: first of all, it is necessary to consider the different technical characteristics of the two sensors [40], in particular the full width at half maximum (FWHM) response at each band, the spectral sampling interval and the spectral range, which entail a systematic differences between sensors [7,45]. However, when moving from laboratory to field conditions the radiometric resolution and the SNR hamper the alignments of dissimilar spectral outputs, and the atmospheric correction introduces non-systematic or random differences between laboratory and remote spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the main challenge is to find a method to align laboratory and remote spectral data [45,60]. Many issues need to be addressed for this goal: first of all, it is necessary to consider the different technical characteristics of the two sensors [40], in particular the full width at half maximum (FWHM) response at each band, the spectral sampling interval and the spectral range, which entail a systematic differences between sensors [7,45]. However, when moving from laboratory to field conditions the radiometric resolution and the SNR hamper the alignments of dissimilar spectral outputs, and the atmospheric correction introduces non-systematic or random differences between laboratory and remote spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a consistent number of spectral-transfer procedures were tested between two datasets both composed of laboratory spectra [38][39][40][41][42][43], the transfer between spectra acquired in laboratory conditions to those acquired by remote sensors is a still rare [44,45]. Moreover, in order to find a reliable transfer function, it is mandatory to collect and scan soil samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F é estimada com o objetivo de produzir, a partir de um espectro x S registrado para uma nova amostra no equipamento secundário, um espectro ajustado, x a , que se assemelhe ao que seria obtido se a mesma amostra tivesse sido analisada no equipamento primário: ] j . Cada elemento do novo espectro terá, portanto, uma dependência linear simples em relação ao elemento correspondente do espectro original, ou seja, a matriz F ajustará separadamente as medidas em cada comprimento de onda 6 . Se os valores não-nulos de F estiverem localizados em uma diagonal secundária abaixo da diagonal principal, cada elemento ajustado será afetado pelo elemento correspondente ao comprimento de onda seguinte.…”
Section: Padronização Das Respostas Espectraisunclassified
“…Recently, multivariate calibration methods appear to be the proper techniques that show the best performance for complex mixture resolution (Vigneau et al, 1997;Massart et al, 1998;Lavine 2000;Haaland et al, 2000;Fearn, 2001;Brereton, 2003;Geladi, 2003;Ragno et al, 2004 One major use of PCR lies in overcoming the multicollinearity problem which arises when two or more of the explanatory variables are close to being collinear. PCR can aptly deal with such situations by excluding some of the lowvariance principal components in the regression step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%