1996
DOI: 10.1016/0924-2031(95)00055-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardisation of near-infrared spectrometric instruments: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a consistent number of spectral-transfer procedures were tested between two datasets both composed of laboratory spectra [38][39][40][41][42][43], the transfer between spectra acquired in laboratory conditions to those acquired by remote sensors is a still rare [44,45]. Moreover, in order to find a reliable transfer function, it is mandatory to collect and scan soil samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a consistent number of spectral-transfer procedures were tested between two datasets both composed of laboratory spectra [38][39][40][41][42][43], the transfer between spectra acquired in laboratory conditions to those acquired by remote sensors is a still rare [44,45]. Moreover, in order to find a reliable transfer function, it is mandatory to collect and scan soil samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that these legacy soil databases need to be standardized themselves before using them for such approach, as some attempts has been already done in that objective (Baume et al, 2011, Ciampalini, 2013 The standardisation applied in our study is composed of a boxcox transformation for normalization of the predicted data, and a scaling and centering of the normalized data. This standardisation process is comparable to one of the most widely used transfer methods for correcting predicted values which is the univariate slope and bias correction (SBC) (Bouveresse et al, 1996). Transfer methods have been developed to enable a calibration model to be effectively transferred between two "systems" (e.g., two spectroscopic instruments), thus eliminating the need for a full recalibration (Fearn 2001;Feudale et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless we believe that the SIC method has several advantages. It: (1) determines the unambiguous number of influential objects for the data and model under consideration; and (2) it takes into account not only X values, but also y values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where y is the n-dimensional response vector, a is the p-dimensional vector of unknown parameters, X is the (n  p) predictor matrix, e e is an unknown error vector; ordinarily rank of matrix X is less than p. The SIC approach is based on a single assumption that all errors, e e, involved in calibration problem (1) are limited (measurement errors in X and y, modeling errors, etc.) [7].…”
Section: Sic Basics Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%