Standardising care in the ICU: a protocol for a scoping review of tools used to improve care delivery

Abstract

Background Increasing numbers of critically ill patients experience a prolonged intensive care unit stay contributing to greater physical and psychological morbidity, strain on families and cost to health systems. Quality improvement tools such as checklists concisely articulate best practices with the aim of improving quality and safety; however, these tools have not been designed for the specific needs of patients with prolonged ICU stay. The primary objective of this review will be to determine the characteristics including format and content of multicomponent tools designed to standardise or improve ICU care. Secondary objectives are to describe the outcomes reported in these tools, the type of patients and settings studied, and to understand how these tools were developed and implemented in clinical practice. Methods We will search the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, OpenGrey, NHS evidence and Trial Registries from January 2000 onwards. We will include primary research studies (e.g. experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies) recruiting more than 10 adult participants admitted to ICUs, high dependency units and weaning centres regardless of length of stay, describing quality improvement tools such as structured care plans or checklists designed to standardize more than one aspect of care delivery. We will extract data on study and patient characteristics, tool design and implementation strategies and measured outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen citations for eligible studies and perform data extraction. Data will be synthesised with descriptive statistics; we will use a narrative synthesis to describe review findings. Discussion The findings will be used to guide development of tools for use with prolonged ICU stay patients. Our group will use experience-based co-design methods to identify the most important actionable processes of care to include in quality improvement tools these patients. Such tools are needed to standardise practice and thereby improve quality of care. Illustrating the development and implementation methods used for such tools will help to guide translation of similar tools into ICU clinical practice and future research. Systematic review registration This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8MRE

Success Factors for Quality and Safety of Intensive Care Unit Transitional Care – Listening to the Sharp End

“…The outcomes of care and patients' experiences with hospital care are related to whether hospitals have sufficient manpower, for example, nurse staffing and supportive work environments (Aiken, 2014;Aiken et al, 2014). Therefore, lifelong learning and competence development for staff seems crucial for safety (Allum et al, 2020).…”

Informing the standardising of care for prolonged stay patients in the intensive care unit: A scoping review of quality improvement tools

“…We report our scoping review in accordance with the guidance provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for -Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (Tricco et al, 2018). Further details of the eligibility criteria, search strategy, screening methods, and data charting processes can be found in our published protocol (Allum et al, 2020).…”

Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent PICS in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

“…Intensive care is the medical care provided to critically ill patients during a medical emergency or crisis, managing severe conditions of all disease types [ 8 ]. Infectious and noninfectious illnesses and injuries contribute significantly to the global burden, with an increasing trend over the years.…”