2012
DOI: 10.7748/ns.26.34.35.s46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardising for reliability: the contribution of tools and checklists

Abstract: This article describes two initiatives from the National Patient Safety Agency, which were developed to address important areas of harm to patients. This harm stems from failing to recognise or respond appropriately to deteriorating patients and errors in pre-operative and peri-operative care of surgical patients. Both initiatives used principles of standardisation, reliability and human factors to develop tools and checklists to improve patient safety, with a common approach to supporting implementation. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple articles mention the allocation of a multidisciplinary team as one of the necessary factors for the implementation of new technology, as different perspectives to the implementation are addressed. Examples of these perspectives are change management, simulations, and stakeholder management [ 12 , 14 18 , 20 23 , 25 27 , 29 31 , 33 35 , 37 43 , 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple articles mention the allocation of a multidisciplinary team as one of the necessary factors for the implementation of new technology, as different perspectives to the implementation are addressed. Examples of these perspectives are change management, simulations, and stakeholder management [ 12 , 14 18 , 20 23 , 25 27 , 29 31 , 33 35 , 37 43 , 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was noted that documentation had flaws, such as missing information, which have also been noted in previous studies (Tran & Johnson , Bump et al . , Beaumont & Russell ). Nurses seemed to accept these flaws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition to breakdowns in multidisciplinary communication, there are also breakdowns in nurse‐to‐nurse communication (Tran & Johnson ): not recording observations, not passing on previous observations, not providing clinical history and not communicating concerns effectively (Beaumont & Russell ). As nurses are often the first to notice changes in patient status, they need to have a strong focus on communication and continuing the flow of information (Deacon & Fairhurst , Chang et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticipated difficult airways should be discussed at the team brief so resources can be gathered in a timely fashion (Beaumont & Russell 2012). It is reasonable for staff to ask their anaesthetist if they are anticipating any airway difficulties that day and if so what the airway management plan is.…”
Section: Continuedmentioning
confidence: 99%