1998
DOI: 10.1021/ac9706335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of Second-Order Chromatographic/Spectroscopic Data for Optimum Chemical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
94
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Background was subtracted by taking the difference of the matrix and a matrix of the same size containing only baseline noise. Prior to applying GRAM and integration, each sample matrix was retention time aligned to the calibration standard using a previously developed algorithm [31]. The number of chemical components (analytes) used in the GRAM analyses was one for the first set of experiments and four for the second.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Background was subtracted by taking the difference of the matrix and a matrix of the same size containing only baseline noise. Prior to applying GRAM and integration, each sample matrix was retention time aligned to the calibration standard using a previously developed algorithm [31]. The number of chemical components (analytes) used in the GRAM analyses was one for the first set of experiments and four for the second.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These requirements are attained when the detector and chromatograph behave linearly, when each analyte has some separation on both columns, and when retention times remain constant between the sample and the standard, or are made constant by an objective alignment procedure [31]. For the experiments reported in this manuscript, these conditions were met.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been various approaches to this end; for example, maximizing agreement between data profiles [5], in rank with a target [6], or of segmented profiles to their target [7]. Other examples include more flexible shaping techniques such as time-warping [8][9][10] or a gradient-based motion estimation [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first group, advantage of the matrix data structure is taken: rank alignment (RA) [45,46] and iterative target transformation factor analysis (ITTFA) [47,48]. In a second group, the maximum correlation between chromatograms is sought: the so-called ChromAlign algorithm [49] and correlation optimized warping (COW) [50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Time Shift Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%