2008
DOI: 10.1080/10520290801987204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of the fluorochromatic reaction test to assess pollen viability

Abstract: The fluorochromatic reaction that viable pollen grains exhibit when exposed to fluorescein diacetate (FDA) is an easy, quick and accurate tool for assessing pollen viability in many plants. Despite its widespread use, the method as initially proposed by Heslop-Harrison and Heslop-Harrison lacks specificity in some respects that are essential for comparing simultaneously the viability of different pollen sources. We have determined the time needed for the fluorochromatic reaction to take place and fade, and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, among all three staining techniques, the FCR test was considered reliable to test viability. In earlier studies also, FCR has also been regarded as the best cytochemical test to measure the viability and ability to germinate of pollen (Heslop-Harrison & Heslop-Harrison 1970;Shivanna & Heslop-Harrison 1981;HeslopHarrison et al 1984;Shivanna et al 1991;Dafni 1992;Kearns & Inouye 1993;Pacini et al 1997;Dafni & Firmage 2000;Pinillos & Cuevas 2008;Aguilera & Valenzuela 2013). However, the Alexander and TTC tests were discarded due to faulty results, as these staining tests did not allow discrimination in regard to the estimation of pollen grain viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, among all three staining techniques, the FCR test was considered reliable to test viability. In earlier studies also, FCR has also been regarded as the best cytochemical test to measure the viability and ability to germinate of pollen (Heslop-Harrison & Heslop-Harrison 1970;Shivanna & Heslop-Harrison 1981;HeslopHarrison et al 1984;Shivanna et al 1991;Dafni 1992;Kearns & Inouye 1993;Pacini et al 1997;Dafni & Firmage 2000;Pinillos & Cuevas 2008;Aguilera & Valenzuela 2013). However, the Alexander and TTC tests were discarded due to faulty results, as these staining tests did not allow discrimination in regard to the estimation of pollen grain viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of pollen produced in the anthers appeared to be greatly reduced in ap2m plants. To look for defects in pollen quality, the viability of pollen grains was tested using propidium iodide and fluorescein diacetate (FDA), which stain dead and live pollen, respectively (Pinillos and Cuevas, 2008) (Figure 4A). Dead pollen grains amounted to 42% in ap2m-1 plants, compared with only 15% in the wild type ( Figure 4B).…”
Section: Ap2m-1 Mutants Have Multiple Defects In Processes Involved Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, by looking at the number of pollen grains stained in red with carmine acetate solution. Second, by incubating extracted pollen in 2.4 3 10 25 M fluorescein diacetate solution for 10 min and measuring fluorescence intensity (l ex = 494 nm, l em = 521 nm) in a Perkin-Elmer LS50B spectrofluorimeter (Pinillos and Cuevas, 2008). Pollen germination tests were performed on glass slides coated with germination medium [0.292 M Suc, 1.27 mM Ca(NO 3 ) 2 , 1.62 mM H 3 BO 3 , 1 mM KH 2 PO 4 , and 0.5% agarose].…”
Section: Pollen Quantification and Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%