Standardization Status of Total Cholesterol Concentration Measurement: Analysis of Korean External Quality Assessment Data

Abstract

Background Total cholesterol concentration measurement is important in the diagnosis of dyslipidemia and evaluation of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Measurement reliability for obtaining an accurate total cholesterol concentration requires procedure standardization. We evaluated the standardization status for total cholesterol concentration measurement through Korean external quality assessment (EQA) data analysis. Methods This study involved 1,670 laboratories that participated in the EQA of total cholesterol concentration measurements in 2019 for 32 products from different manufacturers. The target concentrations of three quality control (QC) materials (samples A, B, and C) were measured using the reference method and compared with EQA data. The performance criteria for total cholesterol concentration measurement were based on the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, with ±3% inaccuracy. Results The target values and inaccuracies of the QC material based on the reference method measurements were 254.65±7.64, 108.30±3.25, and 256.29±7.69 mg/dL (6.59±0.20, 2.80±0.08, and 6.63±0.20 mmol/L) for samples A, B, and C, respectively. The performance criteria were not met in 42.7% laboratories for sample A, 68.4% of laboratories for sample B, and 38.0% laboratories for sample C. Conclusions Despite significant efforts to accurately measure total cholesterol concentrations, further actions are needed for measurement standardization. Manufacturers reporting values that differ from target values should check calibrator traceability; additional efforts to accurately measure total cholesterol concentrations are required for laboratories that use products from these manufacturers.

Quality Status of the Preanalytical Phase of Clinical Laboratories in Korea

“…연구와 노력이 있었고, 내부정도관리, 외부정도관리 및 검사실 신 임인증심사 등을 통해 꾸준히 검사실품질을 관리해 왔기에 검사 의 품질을 높일 수 있었다 [4,5]. 반면, 검사전단계는 여러 직종의 인 력이 업무에 관여하고 검사 종류에 따라 처방-검체전처리 방법과 절차가 다양해서 오류 위험이 높은데도, 진단검사의학과에서 전통 적으로 하던 업무 범위를 벗어나 있었기 때문에 그동안 충분히 관 리하지 못하였다.…”

Laboratory Data Quality Evaluation in the Big Data Era

“…However, this is not true. Despite the long journey of standardization and harmonization efforts [ 2 - 4 ], a large bias in test results is observed when the same sample is tested in different laboratories. Even for standardized or harmonized test items, big data results may be biased if unreliable test results from certain laboratories are included.…”