2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3139-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardized Multi-Color Flow Cytometry and Computational Biomarker Discovery

Abstract: Multi-color flow cytometry has become a valuable and highly informative tool for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of patients with immune deficiencies or inflammatory disorders. However, the method complexity and error-prone conventional manual data analysis often result in a high variability between different analysts and research laboratories. Here, we provide strategies and guidelines aiming at a more standardized multi-color flow cytometric staining and unsupervised data analysis for whole blood patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For initial clustering during SPADE analysis (to generate the tree), expression of HLA-DR, CD11c, CD1c, CD141, slan (MDC8), CD14, and CD123 was used. An adapted script provided by Stephan Schlickeiser (Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany) (23) was used to perform the clustering analysis in R (24). The expression data of three independent donors were used to generate 120 clusters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For initial clustering during SPADE analysis (to generate the tree), expression of HLA-DR, CD11c, CD1c, CD141, slan (MDC8), CD14, and CD123 was used. An adapted script provided by Stephan Schlickeiser (Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany) (23) was used to perform the clustering analysis in R (24). The expression data of three independent donors were used to generate 120 clusters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproducible flow cytometry starts at the sample preparation stage, with clearly defined standard operating procedures (SOPs) for sample handling and staining, followed by an appropriate setup of the flow cytometer 20 . The use of setup beads, a proper panel design and standardized nomenclature for markers and channels 21 all contribute to increasing the quality and reproducibility of flow cytometry experiments.…”
Section: Standardization and Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different consortia listed below aimed to address diverse levels of reproducibility: (a) the reproducibility of interpretation (all consortia; some argue that more is not necessary for their purpose such as Harmonemia (17), AIEOP-BFM group (3,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), and ERIC (21-23)), (b) the reproducibility of enumeration (prominently in immunology: The ONE Study (24,25), HIPC (14,26,27), but also in the leukemia residual disease detection: EuroFlow (28)(29)(30), COG group (31), and ERIC (21,22)), (c) the reproducibility of staining pattern is typically achieved when the same panel of reagents is used (The ONE Study (25), HIPC (26), EuroFlow (32,33), and COG (31)), which allows definition of the manual analysis strategy and also automated analysis tools, and (d) the reproducibility of patterns including the staining intensity that allows analysis standardization and database-assisted comparison to previous cases in interlaboratory settings: EuroFlow (34) or The Canadian National Transplant Research Program that analyzed multiple immune cells in multiple centers by automated analysis (35). Different consortia listed below aimed to address diverse levels of reproducibility: (a) the reproducibility of interpretation (all consortia; some argue that more is not necessary for their purpose such as Harmonemia (17), AIEOP-BFM group (3,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), and ERIC (21-23)), (b) the reproducibility of enumeration (prominently in immunology: The ONE Study (24,25), HIPC (14,2...…”
Section: Existing Efforts To Achieve Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They designed a panel of six tubes (seven to nine colors) and had those prepared as dried reagents formulated per single test. A detailed guide to their approach was published in 2016 (24). Later, they performed a single laboratory study reporting age and gender differences on a cohort of 98 healthy adults (49).…”
Section: Existing Efforts To Achieve Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%