2011
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardized pretreatment breast MRI—accuracy and influence on mastectomy decisions

Abstract: Increased mastectomy rate from 29 to 52.8% after standardization of pre-treatment breast MRI for invasive cancer is largely due to MRI findings of increased extent of disease. These MRI findings correlate well with pathologic findings and appear to justify the performance of mastectomies in these patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have compared tumor size assessment between MRI and mammogram (MGM) and ultrasound (U/S) and many have shown that MRI is superior to MGM and/or U/S for size assessment and extent of tumor. 13,[18][19][20][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] However, few of these studies have examined how often a breast MRI is more accurate then the combined results of a MGM or U/S for tumor size and tumor foci. In other words, if the MGM and U/S agreed on tumor size or foci, how often did the MRI give us a more accurate reading then the MGM and U/S?…”
Section: Even Older Patients From a Surveillance Epidemiology And Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have compared tumor size assessment between MRI and mammogram (MGM) and ultrasound (U/S) and many have shown that MRI is superior to MGM and/or U/S for size assessment and extent of tumor. 13,[18][19][20][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] However, few of these studies have examined how often a breast MRI is more accurate then the combined results of a MGM or U/S for tumor size and tumor foci. In other words, if the MGM and U/S agreed on tumor size or foci, how often did the MRI give us a more accurate reading then the MGM and U/S?…”
Section: Even Older Patients From a Surveillance Epidemiology And Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, benign and malignant processes cannot be distinguished by MRI alone . Previous studies have shown an estimated specificity rate of 65%‐86% for the detection of breast cancer by MRI …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Previous studies have shown an estimated specificity rate of 65%-86% for the detection of breast cancer by MRI. [4][5][6] Prior studies evaluated how often the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients is changed with the performance of preoperative breast MRI and have demonstrated results which range from 13% to 30%. [6][7][8][9][10][11] There is conflicting evidence regarding the effect of preoperative breast MRI on re-excision rates with some studies reporting lower re-excision rates among patients who underwent preoperative MRI vs those that did not [12][13][14] and other studies reporting no significant change in re-excision rates between the two groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple single-institution studies have shown that preoperative MRI is associated with increased mastectomy rates. (1315) Sommer et al found higher mastectomy rates for Medicare-enrolled women (N=46,824) from 2003–2005 who received preoperative MRI (40.8%) as compared to those who did not (38.8%) (p=.04). (4) Prior studies have shown conflicting results on the ability of MRI to decrease reoperation rates, diminish ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, or improve survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%