Standards as Hybrids

Fomin, Vladislav V.

doi:10.4018/jitsr.2012070105

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Value system theories related to competition, such as (Porter 2001;Prahalad & Ramaswamy 2004), and collaboration, for instance (Iansiti & Levien 2004;Schilling & Phelps 2007;Adner 2017) provide the starting point. Related theories and literature on regulation, such as (Fransman 2010;Cherry 2007) and standardization, for instance (Swann 2010) with specific focus on collaboration (Leiponen 2008;Hillebrand 2013;Fomin 2012) and competition (Shapiro & Varian 1999) frame the value system thinking. Complex systems theories encourage focusing on network models, such as (Barabási 2002), and theoretical aspects, like the set of conceptual system attractors (Strogatz 2001), which provide a reference to the characterization of complex value systems.…”

Section: Research Objective and Main Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Broader understanding of the principles of collaboration between multiple standardization organizations is in its early phase, where different types of forums and their collaboration needs are noted, but further work is needed, for instance, related to the evolution of the standardization activities (Farrell & Simcoe 2012), such as the multi-stakeholder platform (MSP) initiative 8 of the European Union. Choosing and developing the best approach to create standards in modern society is by far not a solved problem (Fomin 2012).…”

Section: Standardization In Value Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clarity of classification becomes necessary when multiple different standardization processes have proliferated, for instance, due to the problems and weaknesses of traditional formal standardization (Hawkins & Ballon 2007;Blind & Gauch 2008). Furthermore, the modern ICT-driven products and services utilize many different standards at the same time requiring business leaders to cope with many, often competing and even conflicting standards at the same time (Fomin 2012).…”

Section: Standardization In Value Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Today, these standards are developed by collaborative, consensus-oriented standardization committees, which are formed to include also private sector contributors. In the latter case, the formal national or regional standardization committee in practice exercises a delegated legal mandate of the governments (Fomin 2012). In such cases, the interplay between regulation and standardization, as well as with the political actors, is tight.…”

Section: Standardization In Value Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Especially understanding the different approaches in different compatibility pursuits is an important issue, as the role of standardization in various business and innovation ecosystems has not yet been addressed broadly (Aarikka-Stenroos et al 2016). For instance, the juxtapositions in standardization (Fomin 2012) are different in case the standardization collaboration and technology convergence initiatives follow the same attractor model like in the case of IEFT and W3C or different, like in the case of IETF and 3GPP.…”

Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evolution toward an open value system for smart mobility services

Casey

Ali-Vehmas

Valovirta

2017

Competition and Regulation in Network Industries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Service adoption strategies of push over cellular The original ideas for the framework came from both Ali-Vehmas and Luukkainen. Ali-Vehmas provided the initial case data while Luukkainen provided primarily theoretical contributions. Both Luukkainen and Ali-Vehmas further developed the journal article based on the initial joint conference paper in the International Conference of Mobile Business (ICMB'05) "Service diffusion strategies for push to talk over cellular", pp 427-433, 2005 presented by Ali-Vehmas. Publication II Evolution of wireless access provisioning: A systems thinking approach The original idea for the developed framework came from Ali-Vehmas. Casey conducted the interviews. Ali-Vehmas and Casey together further developed the framework and did the analysis. Ali-Vehmas and Casey together also wrote and edited the article. Publication III Complex network perspective to collaboration in the ICT standardization The original idea for the research came from Ali-Vehmas. Ali-Vehmas is the sole contributor of this article. Nokia Corporation provided the raw data sets. Publication IV Value system evolution toward a cognitive radio era: Implications of underlying market dynamics The article continued the work of Publication II. Casey developed the simulation model to which Ali-Vehmas provided comments. Casey and Ali-Vehmas together did the analysis. Casey wrote the first version of the article. Ali-Vehmas added text, further developed some of the conceptual ideas, and edited the article. Casey presented the paper in the IEEE 2012 DySPAN conference. Publication V Examining value system transitions: The case of smart mobility services The article is an application of the methodologies of Publications II and III in a qualitative analysis. Ali-Vehmas and Casey contributed to the case study. Ali-Vehmas further developed the detailed analysis. Ali-Vehmas and Casey wrote and edited the article. Ali-Vehmas presented the paper in the HICSS 48 conference. Research approach Concepts and methods developed for studying complex adaptive systems provide a compelling framework for the research on value systems with complexity. This thesis applies earlier conceptual models of complex systems to empirical ICT-driven value systems to develop a model for complex value systems, which can be used to examine behaviors of such systems. Empirical value systems

show abstract

Section: Research Objective and Main Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Standardization In Value Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Standardization In Value Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Standardization In Value Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evolution toward an open value system for smart mobility services

Casey

Ali-Vehmas

Valovirta

2017

Competition and Regulation in Network Industries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Computerized Information Standards Enabling Innovation in Public Procurement of Buildings

Koch

Jacobsen²

2014

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information Standards Enabling or Constraining Innovative Hospital Facilities? -A Scandinavian Case

Koch

Jacobsen²,

Moum

2014

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The losses from suboptimal interoperability in IT supported design, production, and operation of health care facilities are tantamount. In these years new built of hospitals in Scandinavia could be realized in a more efficient and innovative way if using information standards. This paper inquires into whether computerized information standards enable or constrain innovation in public procurement of buildings. In architectural and engineering design of public buildings the project based product development tends be done in constellations of firms in interorganisational contracting, which do not provide stability or room for innovation. A large hospital project was investigated through interviews, documents and observations. The effects of implementing building information standards are both inter-and intraorganisational. The building client claims to have saved money, through better structured building component data that gave considerable positive effects during tendering. The IT-suppliers develop IT-tools, and the AEC companies can commence develop services preparing for new markets.

show abstract

Standards as Hybrids

Cited by 6 publications

References 27 publications

Evolution toward an open value system for smart mobility services

Evolution toward an open value system for smart mobility services

Computerized Information Standards Enabling Innovation in Public Procurement of Buildings

Information Standards Enabling or Constraining Innovative Hospital Facilities? -A Scandinavian Case

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About