2007
DOI: 10.7249/mg589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards-Based Accountability Under No Child Left Behind: Experiences of Teachers and Administrators in Three States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
122
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
122
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…While the United States and other English-speaking countries share common socio-cultural roots, there are considerable differences as to which educational policies are implemented and how they are carried out. For example, Hamilton et al (2007) reported that teachers in California, Georgia, and Pennsylvania had very similar responses, experiences, and attitudes towards standards-based accountability assessments; they attributed this to similarities between the systems. Based on survey studies using the TCoA inventory, it was found that teachers in New Zealand and Queensland, which have similar low-stakes assessment systems, had very similar conceptions of assessment, except for the notion of assessment being used to make schools accountable which was endorsed more by New Zealand primary teachers, a difference attributed to a greater emphasis on school self-management in New Zealand (Brown, Lake, & Matters, 2011).…”
Section: Context Effects On Teacher Conceptions Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While the United States and other English-speaking countries share common socio-cultural roots, there are considerable differences as to which educational policies are implemented and how they are carried out. For example, Hamilton et al (2007) reported that teachers in California, Georgia, and Pennsylvania had very similar responses, experiences, and attitudes towards standards-based accountability assessments; they attributed this to similarities between the systems. Based on survey studies using the TCoA inventory, it was found that teachers in New Zealand and Queensland, which have similar low-stakes assessment systems, had very similar conceptions of assessment, except for the notion of assessment being used to make schools accountable which was endorsed more by New Zealand primary teachers, a difference attributed to a greater emphasis on school self-management in New Zealand (Brown, Lake, & Matters, 2011).…”
Section: Context Effects On Teacher Conceptions Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(2) (Hamilton et al, 2007;Stecher et al, 2008). Though the state in question did test students annually in all four subjects, whether a school made Adequate Yearly Progress under No Child Left Behind was determined by students' scores in language arts and math (and by graduation rates for high schools).…”
Section: Distribution Of Teacher Qualifications and Value-added By Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Általános tendencia, hogy rendszerszintű értékelési programok hatására a tanárok a mérés keretében használt tesztek feladatait gyakrabban használták fel az osztálytermi ér-tékelés során (l. Hamilton, Berends és Stecher, 2005). Továbbá a pedagógusok olyan formátumú teszteket készítenek az osztálytermi értékeléshez, amelyek megegyeznek az ál-lami mérések tesztjének formátumával, tipikusan előtérbe kerülnek a könnyen értékelhe-tő, többszörös választásos feladatok (Abrams, Pedulla és Madaus, 2003;Aydeniz és Southerland, 2012).…”
Section: Az Elszámoltathatóság Hatása Az Osztálytermi Folyamatokraunclassified