2019
DOI: 10.1037/hea0000770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards for economic analyses of interventions for the field of health psychology and behavioral medicine.

Abstract: Behavioral interventions can be offered within a wide range of contexts, including public health, medicine, surgery, physical rehabilitation, nutrition, and other health services. These differing services compete for the same resources and it is difficult to compare their value. Systematic standardized methodologies for valuing outcomes are available and are being applied by economists and health services researchers, but are not widely used in our field. With support from the Society for Health Psychology, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant gap identified in our review of implementation features was that none of the studies in the review provided costing information. The ability of this field to communicate cost-effectiveness data to policy makers that incorporate implementation costs is central to the likelihood of interventions being adopted by practitioners and would be in alignment with emerging standards for reporting [84]. Future studies could look to advances in implementation science to incorporate methodologies and outcomes that address these issues.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant gap identified in our review of implementation features was that none of the studies in the review provided costing information. The ability of this field to communicate cost-effectiveness data to policy makers that incorporate implementation costs is central to the likelihood of interventions being adopted by practitioners and would be in alignment with emerging standards for reporting [84]. Future studies could look to advances in implementation science to incorporate methodologies and outcomes that address these issues.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the ability to offer accessible health care services, designed to improve long-term population-based healthy lifestyle behaviors (Carey et al, 2018 ), may also increase potential for lowering societal health care costs (Shrank et al, 2019 ) while simultaneously offering patients quality-of-life improvements such as increased physical energy, greater engagement in family and social support networks, improved physical ability to maintain employment, and increased physical recreation and volunteerism, etc. However, challenges remain for establishing effective and equitable reimbursement models for non-traditional behavioral services within medical settings (Wilson et al, 2019 ), without which widespread adoption may be hindered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fresh attention was brought to CIR in 2019 by Health Psychology volume 38, issue 8. This publication devoted succinct articles to clear definitions of different methods of CIR (Kaplan et al, 2019), carefully structured meta-analytic summaries of CIR on depression, chronic pain, and insomnia (Jacobsen et al, 2019; Wilson et al, 2019), and cogent final words on CIR by Spring (2019). CIR in health psychology did not increase noticeably, however, in the ensuing years.…”
Section: Cost-inclusive Research In Health Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%