1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0022050700029132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards of Living and the Life Cycle in Colonial Connecticut

Abstract: Requirements for a subsistence standard of living and for higher levels in the colonial period changed with marital status. A man's income, his personal wealth, his consumption goods, and for farmers their land, had to increase with marriage and as children multiplied, though the old man might end as he began, dependent on other members of the family. In order to judge the proportion of men at different levels of wealth, and to measure inequality, the historian must construct a series of tables using all avail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a discussion of life-cycle saving motivation and behavior, see Shorrocks 1975a;King 1985;Modigliani 1988;Kotlikoff 1988;Kessler and Masson 1989;Hurd 1990;and Burbidge and Davies 1994. For examples of work using the life cycle in economic history, see Haines 1985;Sutch 1991;Main 1983;Jones 1980;and Kearl and Pope 1983. 11 Sources for the data set were (1) Public Archives of Ontario, Surrogate Court Wills, 1892, and (2) Public Archives of Canada, Census of Canada, 1891, Manuscripts.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a discussion of life-cycle saving motivation and behavior, see Shorrocks 1975a;King 1985;Modigliani 1988;Kotlikoff 1988;Kessler and Masson 1989;Hurd 1990;and Burbidge and Davies 1994. For examples of work using the life cycle in economic history, see Haines 1985;Sutch 1991;Main 1983;Jones 1980;and Kearl and Pope 1983. 11 Sources for the data set were (1) Public Archives of Ontario, Surrogate Court Wills, 1892, and (2) Public Archives of Canada, Census of Canada, 1891, Manuscripts.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%