Standing at the Intersections: Navigating Life as a Black Intersex Man

Wall, Sean Saifa

doi:10.1353/nib.2015.0046

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 2 shows the seven types of methods described in the sources. The most common methods in 18 sources constituted autobiographical critical analyses/narratives of author's intervention impacts, observations, and/or views (Amanda, 2015; Baratz & Karkazis, 2015;Cynthia, 2015;Davis, 2015b;Frader, 2015;Garcia, 2015;Inter, 2015;Long, 2015;Pagonis, 2015;Petersen, 2015;Quinn, 2015;Simon, 2015;Truffer, 2015;Viloria, 2015;von Klan, 2015;Wall, 2015;Walsh, 2015;Zieselman, 2015). These studies were mainly on one adult individual (usually a community member rather than an MD or academic) considering his or her own experiences across his or her lifetime, especially the negative wellbeing impacts of receiving a lack of information and/or negative well-being and health impacts of early intervention without express consent (including feelings of disconnection from health care processes, trauma and depression, infertility, decreased sexual function/pleasure, undesired sex-based presentations, and/or surgical complications).…”

Section: Methods and Participant Numbersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sources specifically featured studies from a total of 21 countries. Over half (31) of the studies were based in the United States (Amanda, 2015;Amarillo et al, 2016;Anderson, 2015;Baratz & Karkazis, 2015;Cynthia, 2015;Davis, 2015b;Dreger, 2015;Frader, 2015;Garcia, 2015;Grimes, 2016;Grover et al, 2015;Howard, 2015;Inter, 2015;Kelsey et al, 2016;Kraus, 2015;Lin-Su et al, 2015;Long, 2015;Miller, 2015;Pagonis, 2015;Petersen, 2015;Quinn, 2015;Rubin, 2015;Saraswat et al, 2015;Simon, 2015;Topcu et al, 2015;Truffer, 2015;Viloria, 2015;von Klan, 2015;Wall, 2015;Walsh, 2015;Zieselman, 2015). Four studies were based in India (Kalra et al, 2016;Khadilkar et al, 2015;Palanisamy et al, 2015;Vasundhera et al, 2016), three in Australia (Dwyer et al, 2015;Jones, 2016;Tinney et al, 2015), and three in Brazil (Brasileiro et al, 2016;Oliveira et al, 2015;Paula et al, 2015).…”

Section: Source Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the journals represented were either medical journals or at least broadly covering a thematic remit inclusive of medical science issues. The largest number of articles (18) from a repeatedly represented journal came from Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics due to its release of a special issue (Volume 5, Issue 2) focused solely on intersex themes not otherwise typical for that journal (Amanda, 2015; Baratz & Karkazis, 2015;Cynthia, 2015;Davis, 2015b;Frader, 2015;Garcia, 2015;Inter, 2015;Long, 2015;Pagonis, 2015;Petersen, 2015;Quinn, 2015;Simon, 2015;Truffer, 2015;Viloria, 2015;von Klan, 2015;Wall, 2015;Walsh, 2015;Zieselman, 2015). Multiple articles also came from Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism (Brasileiro et al, 2016;Grover et al, 2015;Mutlu et al, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2015;Paula et al, 2015;Topcu et al, 2015), and three articles from International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology (Grimbly et al, 2016;Lin-Su et al, 2015;Lucas-Herald et al, 2015).…”

Section: Source Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Community group-centered. There was strong representation (in 18 sources) of the Bioethical Narrative Inquiry lens specifically from Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics Volume 5, Issue 2 (Amanda, 2015; Baratz & Karkazis, 2015;Cynthia, 2015;Davis, 2015b;Frader, 2015;Garcia, 2015;Inter, 2015;Long, 2015;Pagonis, 2015;Petersen, 2015;Quinn, 2015;Simon, 2015;Truffer, 2015;Viloria, 2015;von Klan, 2015;Wall, 2015;Walsh, 2015;Zieselman, 2015). The introducing editor Georgiann Davis had actively described the issue as intentionally pitched at disrupting the dominance of Medical/Clinical lenses for work on people with intersex variations (Davis, 2015b).…”

Section: Patient-centeredmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sources provided a mixture of messages about health care intervention for people with intersex variations: 27 sources cast medical interventions as potentially problematic for the group's health or well-being (Amanda, 2015; Anderson, 2015;Anonymous, 2016;Baratz & Karkazis, 2015;Cynthia, 2015;Davis, 2015b;Dreger, 2015;Frader, 2015;Garcia, 2015;Grimes, 2016;Inter, 2015;Jones, 2016;Kraus, 2015;Lalor, 2015;Long, 2015;Miller, 2015;Pagonis, 2015;Petersen, 2015;Quinn, 2015;Saraswat et al, 2015;Simon, 2015;Truffer, 2015;Viloria, 2015;von Klan, 2015;Wall, 2015;Walsh, 2015;Zieselman, 2015). Nineteen cast interventions as unproblematic (Achermann et al, 2015;Ahmed & Fadl-Elmula, 2016;Amarillo et al, 2016;Bonanni et al, 2015;Brasileiro et al, 2016;Ceci et al, 2015;Dong et al, 2016;Ediati et al, 2015;Ekenze et al, 2015;Grimbly et al, 2016;Kelsey et al, 2016;Khadilkar et al, 2015;Latrech et al, 2015;Lucas-Herald et...…”

Section: Framing Of Participants and Health-related Messages About Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature

Jones

2018

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a need to better understand contemporary issues of nomenclature and group construction around people with intersex variations shaping health research and practices-including their framing within concepts like disorders of sex development (DSD), intersex, or the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) umbrella. This article reviews health literature in the broad field of Intersex Studies since 2015. It outlines the contexts, theoretical lenses, methods and participant numbers, framing of participants, and health findings around interventions evident in 61 sources. Sources came from the African region, American Canadian region, Asia-Pacific region, European region, and the Middle East. While healthrelated work was largely found in medical journals, it was also located in publications focused on a range of other fields including, for example, bioethics, education, and legal studies. The piece discusses the tensions between institutional expertcentered work with a traditional clinical/medical lens and the arguments found in a range of other patient-centered, community group-centered, and theory-centered sources applying innovative perspectives onto key issues. Liberal Constructivist, Bioethical Narrative Inquiry, Critical Intersex Studies, and Critical LGBTI Liberationist lenses have introduced a range of methods (from autobiographical analyses through to large-scale online surveys) to questions of the need for and processes of certain health care interventions and norms in the treatment of patients with intersex variations. Problematic practices in clinical health care and research are identified and discussed: particularly the lack of adequate information dissemination and consent-gleaning in areas ranging from anatomical photography through to application of "corrective" genital surgeries.

show abstract

Section: Methods and Participant Numbersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Source Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Source Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Patient-centeredmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Framing Of Participants and Health-related Messages About Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature

Jones

2018

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intersex Youth: A Call for Dignity in Mental Health Care

Skaggs,

Wall

2023

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Critical Perspectives on Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feminist and queer science: Principles for research with gender, sex, and sexuality in psychology and beyond.

Anders¹,

Schudson²,

Beischel³

et al. 2023

Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feminist/queer science offers exciting possibilities for psychology and other fields. In this article, we review a set of dynamic principles for feminist/queer science, based in research with gender, sex, and sexuality (gender/sex/uality). There are potentially surprising ways that queer and science overlap for a queer science, and we focus on four: construction, openness, challenge, and multiplicities. There are also meeting points between feminism and science that support a feminist science, and we again focus on four: bias, truth, objectivity, and empiricism. Yet there are a number of challenges to feminist/queer science, including those that are epistemological, empirical, and methodological. We detail these, articulating how feminist/queer science also provides ways to address, sidestep, and move beyond them. Throughout, we articulate how feminist/queer science provides a dynamic and rigorous way forward for psychological science as well as other fields, and we conclude by articulating how it can lead to more empirical, accurate, and just knowledge.

show abstract

Standing at the Intersections: Navigating Life as a Black Intersex Man

Cited by 6 publications

References 3 publications

Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature

Intersex Studies: A Systematic Review of International Health Literature

Intersex Youth: A Call for Dignity in Mental Health Care

Feminist and queer science: Principles for research with gender, sex, and sexuality in psychology and beyond.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About