2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standing in an unstable shoe increases postural sway and muscle activity of selected smaller extrinsic foot muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these studies showed that COP excursions significantly increased in the two-legged stance conditions, for both the anterior-posterior and the medial-lateral direction when comparing the unstable (MBT) condition to the barefoot condition Landry et al, 2010). This result is demonstrated using illustrative data for one subject (Fig.…”
Section: Static Stability (Standing In Unstable Shoes)mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of these studies showed that COP excursions significantly increased in the two-legged stance conditions, for both the anterior-posterior and the medial-lateral direction when comparing the unstable (MBT) condition to the barefoot condition Landry et al, 2010). This result is demonstrated using illustrative data for one subject (Fig.…”
Section: Static Stability (Standing In Unstable Shoes)mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Other studies addressed the effects of unstable footwear on posture (New & Pearce, 2007). Some studies discussed the effects of unstable shoes on pressure distribution (Stewart et al, 2007;Bochdansky et al, 2008;Maetzler et al, 2008) and other studies addressed training effects with unstable shoes (Kraus et al, 2006;Korsten et al, 2008;Lohrer et al, 2008;Korsten et al, 2010;Landry et al, 2010). However, this review will concentrate on some specific claims that have been made about the effects produced by unstable shoes.…”
Section: The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, manufacturers have introduced specific shoes featuring unstable sole constructions to induce similar neuromuscular training stimuli. Previous research reported that these shoes improved reactive balance in children with development disabilities [6], improved static and dynamic balance in adults with osteoarthritis [7] and in middle-aged adults [8,9], and also in young subjects in dynamic conditions like standing on a moveable platform [10]. Electromyography studies revealed changes in the ankle joint during quiet standing [8,11], gait and running [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous research reported that these shoes improved reactive balance in children with development disabilities [6], improved static and dynamic balance in adults with osteoarthritis [7] and in middle-aged adults [8,9], and also in young subjects in dynamic conditions like standing on a moveable platform [10]. Electromyography studies revealed changes in the ankle joint during quiet standing [8,11], gait and running [12,13]. These are important findings since standing sway is highly correlated with ankle joint rotation, as muscles crossing this joint are able to provide the sensory information required to maintain upright standing [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, divergence exists as to the benefits from wearing this kind of shoes on postural control. Previous research has demonstrated that wearing this kind of unstable shoes regularly leads to changes in muscle activity level, mainly at the ankle joint, during upright standing (Sousa et al, 2012) and to decreased centre of pressure (CoP) excursion in young subjects (Landry et al, 2010); although no changes have been observed in the mean velocity of the CoP in mid-aged women (Ramstrand et al, 2010), neither in the CoP excursion in one-leg stance in young subjects (Turbanski et al, 2011). This divergence could result from the few parameters analysed, as a larger set of measures is required to detect differences in postural control (Pavol, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%