Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited?

Abstract

We describe the characteristics of displacement of the head and hip in normal young subjects standing on a moving platform undergoing continuous sinusoidal horizontal translation in the antero-posterior direction, at frequencies ranging from 0.1-1 Hz. The head, hip and malleolus were marked by light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and the displacement of each LED was quantified by (1) the measure of the shift during each cycle of translation, (2) the standard deviation (SD) of the path travelled during the whole trial, (3) the power spectrum (PS) of the signal and (4) the cross-correlation (CC) between pairs of LED signals. At each frequency of translation, with eyes open (EO), the displacement of head was smaller than that of hip, and the displacement of hip was smaller than that of malleolus. With eyes closed (EC), this order was reversed. The peak value of the CC functions of the pairs malleolus/head, malleolus/hip and hip/head decreased by passing from low to high frequency of translation, under both visual conditions, and decreased more for the pair malleolus/head than malleolus/hip. The lags between body segment displacements ranged between 30 ms and 150 ms, on average, the former segment of each pair preceding the latter. The fast Fourier transformation of hip and head displacement showed a power spectrum peak at the frequency imposed by the platform translation. The peak was larger with EC than EO. With EC, another peak appeared at 0.2 Hz, possibly corresponding to the respiratory frequency. We conclude that, when vision was allowed, subjects behaved as a non-rigid, noninverted pendulum, and stabilised head in space. When vision was denied, head oscillated more than the platform, especially at low translation frequencies. Therefore, the strategy of balance control shifted from a pendulum to an inverted-pendulum behaviour, passing from active head-and-trunk control to maximal body compliance to the perturbation.

Blood alcohol concentration at 0.06 and 0.10% causes a complex multifaceted deterioration of body movement control

“…Repeated balance challenges in healthy sober subjects usually introduce an adaptive process enabling them to handle the balance challenges more easily after a learning phase (Corna et al, 1999). However, as illustrated by the significant interaction between period and alcohol in the multivariate GLM ANOVA analysis for all recorded body positions, alcohol intoxication had a very strong and growing destabilizing influence on the ability to handle sustained balance perturbations.…”

Effects of postural and cognitive difficulty levels on the standing of healthy young males on an unstable platform

“…The CoM diagrams in diverse cognitive conditions also were relatively negative due to the absence of the vision. Previous studies reported the importance of vision on balance control but some of them compared its role with other sources of information during the balance like interference with proprioception of the neck and leg muscles (Bove et al 2009, De Nunzio et al 2005) and velocity of the support movement (Corna et al 1999, Diener et al 1982). …”

Anticipatory postural control during arm movements and floor translation

“…Subjects can acquire sensory information and anticipate the postural disturbance associated with the floor oscillation, and can therefore easily improve postural stability [26][27][28][29] . The improvement is brought by the control of individual body segments with minimum postural muscle activity 30) . During the floor oscillations, postural control against anterior and posterior perturbations is the most important issue.…”