2021
DOI: 10.1002/smj.3269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standing out from the crowd: Dedicated institutional investors and strategy uniqueness

Abstract: Research summary: This article examines the effect of dedicated institutional investors on firms' strategy uniqueness. We build on the uniqueness paradox where unique strategies are important drivers of economic rent, yet create an information problem whereby CEOs face discounts from the capital market, thus discouraging them from selecting unique strategies. We propose dedicated institutional investors as a partial remedy to the uniqueness paradox. Dedicated institutional investors invest in gaining private i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investment horizon is a key dimension of shareholder influence because the literature reveals that almost every aspect of a shareholder's interaction with a company partly depends on the shareholder's holding period. Shareholders with shorter horizons seem to suffer more from information asymmetry and may steer away from initiatives that are harder to evaluate (Oehmichen, Firk, Wolff, & Maybuechen, 2021), such as innovation-based activities. Shareholders with short horizons may also aggressively intervene in corporate affairs to quickly achieve their intended objectives but provide little knowledge and insight to managers in the process.…”
Section: A Process and Typology For Mapping Shareholder Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Investment horizon is a key dimension of shareholder influence because the literature reveals that almost every aspect of a shareholder's interaction with a company partly depends on the shareholder's holding period. Shareholders with shorter horizons seem to suffer more from information asymmetry and may steer away from initiatives that are harder to evaluate (Oehmichen, Firk, Wolff, & Maybuechen, 2021), such as innovation-based activities. Shareholders with short horizons may also aggressively intervene in corporate affairs to quickly achieve their intended objectives but provide little knowledge and insight to managers in the process.…”
Section: A Process and Typology For Mapping Shareholder Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…David et al (2010), for instance, argued that durable shareholders allow managers and employees considerable discretion as to how to utilize the firm's resources (also see Connelly, Tihanyi, Ketchen, Carnes, & Ferrier, 2017). More recent works suggest that durable investment can make managers “feel less threatened” in general (Oehmichen et al, 2021: 6) and less sensitive (Schulz & Wiersema, 2018) to myopic investment pressures (Zhang & Gimeno, 2016).…”
Section: Shareholder Types and Stakeholder Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While early research on the role of ownership focused mostly on its concentration (e.g., Amihud & Lev, 1981; Demsetz, 1983; Demsetz & Lehn, 1985; Shleifer & Vishny, 1997), an effort for more fine‐grained understanding of the heterogeneity in owner preferences in relation to specific types of owners surfaced soon after (e.g., Brickley et al, 1988; Bushee, 1998). Subsequent work has differentiated owners based on their national origin (Aguilera & Crespí‐Cladera, 2016; Kavadis & Castañer, 2014; Kavadis & Castañer, 2015; Pedersen & Thomsen, 1997) and continued to study different types of ownership, such as founder, family, corporate, governmental, and institutional (Aguilera et al, 2015; Thomsen & Pedersen, 2000; Tihanyi et al, 2019; Wood & Wright, 2015), even focusing on differences within type, such as long‐term versus short‐term institutional investors (Connelly et al, 2016; Oehmichen et al, 2021), and shareholders investing in competing firms (Azar et al, 2018; He & Huang, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%