2000
DOI: 10.1109/7.845254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STAP for clutter suppression with sum and difference beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: Our proof proceeds in parallel with the one in [8]. Let (6) denote the unknown parameter vector, where is the vector made up with the elements of , i.e., , , , for , where denotes the imaginary-part operator. Then, the Fisher information matrix for the parameter vector is given by (7) where denotes the trace operator.…”
Section: Cramér-rao Bound For Bs Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof: Our proof proceeds in parallel with the one in [8]. Let (6) denote the unknown parameter vector, where is the vector made up with the elements of , i.e., , , , for , where denotes the imaginary-part operator. Then, the Fisher information matrix for the parameter vector is given by (7) where denotes the trace operator.…”
Section: Cramér-rao Bound For Bs Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate the difficulty, a dimension reduction matrix , , may be used to transform an element space (ES) measurement vector to a beamspace (BS) measurement vector , where superscript denotes the conjugate transpose. The BS transformation matrix, may be designed under different criteria, for example, to cover a given spatial sector [1], to maximize the signal to noise ratio (SNR) in the sector [2], to minimize the interfering power [3], to minimize the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) [4], or simply to ease the implementation by employing the discrete Fourier transformation (DFT) [5], [6], [7]. Apart from the DFT-based transformation, the above-mentioned will have arbitrary complex-numbered elements, and therefore, they will incur higher hardware cost than the case with unit-modulus complex numbers, if is to be implemented with analog parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the STAP approach is developed for clutter suppression, which involves adaptively adjusting the space-time filter response in attempt at maximizing output signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio and improving radar detection performance [33], [34]. In [35], the STAP approach for clutter suppression with sum and difference beams is discussed, where the performance for airborne clutter rejection is shown. In [36], an adaptive filtering method is utilized to calibrate the monostatic and bistatic radars of a monopulse SAR system, where the blind calibration of two channels enables to null stationary scene and detect moving targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is further investigated to estimate the angles and ranges of multiple unresolved extended targets in [7]. In [8], the authors focus on space-time adaptive processing [9][10][11][12] and devise decision schemes for pointlike targets, which suitably exploit the spillover of target energy to provide accurate estimates of the target position within the CUT (subbin accuracy). The range gates are formed by sampling the output of a filter matched to the transmitted pulse, such as p(t), every T p seconds, with T p as the duration of p(t).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%