Respiratory specimens from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients challenge microbiological laboratories with their complexity of pathogens and atypical variants. We evaluated the diagnostic procedures in German laboratories by use of a questionnaire. Although most laboratories followed guidelines, some of them served only a small number of patients, while others did not use the recommended selective agars to culture the particular CF-relevant species. C ystic fibrosis (CF) patients suffer from chronic recurrent airway infections, which cause phenotypical changes (small-colony variants [SCVs]; mucoid phenotypes) of typical CF pathogens and the selection of multiresistant and rare bacteria such as Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) or nontuberculous mycobacteria due to repeated antimicrobial therapies and adaptation of the bacteria to this particular niche. To provide optimal microbiological diagnostic special culture conditions, knowledge and experience about the typical CF pathogens and their phenotypical changes are required.(Part of this work was presented at the Annual Meeting of the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology, 2012, Hamburg, Germany [CFP01].)The status of the microbiological diagnostic procedures of laboratories serving CF centers, which participate in the German "Quality assurance cystic fibrosis project" (1), was evaluated by use of a questionnaire. First, contributing CF centers were asked to provide the address of their microbiological laboratories. Second, a questionnaire based on the German microbiological infectious quality standards for airway infections in CF (Mikrobiologischinfektiologische Qualitätsstandards [MiQ]) (2) which were published by the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology (3) and on the protocols provided by the consultant laboratories for CF microbiology (Institute of Microbiology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany; Max von Pettenkofer-Institute for Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Munich, Germany) was sent to the laboratories. A translation of the main recommendations by the MiQ, which are comparable to the guidelines of the UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust (4) is provided in the supplemental material (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).Seventy-eight of 83 (94%) CF centers provided the address of the microbiological laboratory, and all these laboratories were contacted. Forty-five of 61 (74%) laboratories responsible for the microbiological testing of 4,664 CF patients (56% of CF patients in Germany in 2010) responded to the questionnaire. Eight laboratories (18%) provide microbiological service for less than 25 CF patients. Eighty-nine percent of the laboratories reported that they used guidelines, and most of them used the MiQ (88%).All laboratories used media to culture the most prevalent CF pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, supportively and/or selectively (Table 1) (2). Some reported the use of more than one medium.Thirteen laboratories used mannitol salt agar as a selective agar for S. aureus, a...