1978
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-28-4-482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staphylococcus hyicus (Sompolinsky 1953) comb. nov. and Staphylococcus hyicus subsp. chromogenes subsp. nov.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
87
0
12

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
87
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The differentiation of S. hyicus and S. chromogenes species has been based on extensive phenotypic character analyses and DNA-DNA hybridization studies [10,15]. In this study, the PFGE analysis of S. hyicus and S. chromogenes DNA showed distinct species SmaI digest fragment patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The differentiation of S. hyicus and S. chromogenes species has been based on extensive phenotypic character analyses and DNA-DNA hybridization studies [10,15]. In this study, the PFGE analysis of S. hyicus and S. chromogenes DNA showed distinct species SmaI digest fragment patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Hunter et al [17] and Amtsberg et al [2] reported that there are pathogenic and non-pathogenic porcine strains of S. hyicus and that these strains can be distinguished by an agglutination test using absorbed antisera. On the other hand, Devriese et al [10] and Takeuchi et al [37] reported that isolates from diseased and healthy pigs resembled each other in most of their biochemical properties. Takeuchi et al [38] also examined the extracellular proteases of S. hyicus with a zymogram method and could not differentiate between isolates from diseased and healthy pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations