1997
DOI: 10.1381/096089297765556024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staple Disruption in Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

Abstract: SD is an inherent problem of VBG which has been underestimated for a long period of time. An SD frequency of 45% or more within the first few years is not acceptable and changes in the VBG technique must be considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One suicide occurred within 5 years of the operation in the study with a cohort of 317 patients and mean follow‐up time of 74 months . Svenheden and colleagues reviewed a cohort of 95 patients for between 6 and 48 months and reported one suicide after 18 months. Cadière et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One suicide occurred within 5 years of the operation in the study with a cohort of 317 patients and mean follow‐up time of 74 months . Svenheden and colleagues reviewed a cohort of 95 patients for between 6 and 48 months and reported one suicide after 18 months. Cadière et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of less than1% [29] to 48% [30] have been reported, but correlation between staple line gaps and weight loss is unclear [31] and longterm weight loss results of VBG are good [31,32]. Longerterm studies of the TOGa procedure will be needed to establish the durability of the staple line and weight loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VGs are pure restrictive procedures and their efficacy to achieve weight loss has largely been demonstrated [4]. Unfortunately, regain of body weight after initial satisfactory weight reduction occurs frequently and more than 50% of patients with a VG may require revisional surgery [5][6][7]. The common reasons for failure are: disruption of the staple line, excessive enlargement of the gastric pouch and inefficiency of the prosthetic mesh or the silastic ring (by disruption or intragastric migration).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%