2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10122.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star clusters with primordial binaries - I. Dynamical evolution of isolated models

Abstract: In order to interpret the results of complex realistic star cluster simulations, which rely on many simplifying approximations and assumptions, it is essential to study the behaviour of even more idealized models, which can highlight the essential physical effects and are amenable to more exact methods. With this aim, we present the results of N-body calculations of the evolution of equal-mass models, starting with primordial binary fractions of 0-100 per cent, with values of N ranging from 256 to 16 384. This… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
104
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the results we compare with below from Heggie et al (2006) adopt the density-weighted average definition of the core radius. As shown in Figure 13, the two definitions differ minimally when the cluster is in the binaryburning phase.…”
Section: Standard Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the results we compare with below from Heggie et al (2006) adopt the density-weighted average definition of the core radius. As shown in Figure 13, the two definitions differ minimally when the cluster is in the binaryburning phase.…”
Section: Standard Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heggie et al (2006) have shown that equation (20) Table 1). The top panel shows M b , the total mass in binaries bound to the cluster (solid line), and M, the total mass of the cluster (dashed line), as functions of time relative to their initial values.…”
Section: Comparison With Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To contribute significantly, a cluster must have had a sufficiently small initial relaxation time to allow the formation of an IMBH through some mild runaway process when the cluster was young, yet not have formed an IMBH with M > 350 M (since this would put IMRIs beyond the Advanced LIGO frequency range). Recent theoretical arguments by Trenti and colleagues (Heggie et al 2006;Trenti et al 2007aTrenti et al , 2007bTrenti 2006) suggest that dynamically old globulars with large core-to-half-mass radius ratios have been heated by a $1000 M IMBH, so these clusters would not contribute to the Advanced LIGO IMRI rate. Note, however, that Hurley (2007) has shown that current observations of the core-to-half-light ratios in globulars do not require 1000 M BHs in most clusters.…”
Section: Number Density Of Globulars With a Suitable Imbhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N s and N b are the initial numbers of binaries and single stars, respectively (e.g., Kroupa 1995;Jahreiß & Wielen 2000;Heggie et al 2006). The period-generating function for the primordial binaries was given by (Kroupa 1995, Eq.…”
Section: Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%