2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star formation complexes in the ‘galaxy-sized’ supergiant shell of the galaxy HolmbergI

Abstract: We present the results of observations of the galaxy Holmberg I carried out at the Russian 6-m telescope in the narrow-band imaging, long-slit spectroscopy, and scanning Fabry-Perot interferometer modes. A detailed analysis of gas kinematics, ionization conditions, and metallicity of star-forming regions in the galaxy is presented. The aim of the paper is to analyse the propagation of star formation in the galaxy and to understand the role of the ongoing star formation in the evolution of the central 'galaxy-s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial data reduction was performed in a standard way using the idl software package written for reducing long-slit spectroscopic data obtained with SCORPIO-2 as it was described in our previous papers (e.g., Egorov et al 2018). After the bias subtraction and cosmic rays hits removal, all individual exposures of each spectrum were stacked; further steps of data reduction include correction of the geometric distortion, normalization to the flat-field spectrum, wavelength calibration, subtraction of the nightsky spectrum, and flux calibration using one of the spectrophotometric standards observed in the same night in a close airmass with the galaxy.…”
Section: Observations and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial data reduction was performed in a standard way using the idl software package written for reducing long-slit spectroscopic data obtained with SCORPIO-2 as it was described in our previous papers (e.g., Egorov et al 2018). After the bias subtraction and cosmic rays hits removal, all individual exposures of each spectrum were stacked; further steps of data reduction include correction of the geometric distortion, normalization to the flat-field spectrum, wavelength calibration, subtraction of the nightsky spectrum, and flux calibration using one of the spectrophotometric standards observed in the same night in a close airmass with the galaxy.…”
Section: Observations and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations with FPI allow this process to be studied in detail. For a detailed review, see Egorov et al (2015) and recent papers on Holmberg I and II (Egorov et al, 2017b(Egorov et al, , 2018) galaxies.…”
Section: Gas In Star-forming Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data reduction was performed in a standard way using the SCORPIO-2 idl-based pipeline as described in Egorov et al (2018). The observations of the spectrophotometric standards BD+28d4211 at a close zenith distance immediately after or before the DDO 53 observations were used to calibrate its spectra to an absolute intensity scale.…”
Section: Long-slit Spectroscopic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…long-slit or integral field unit (IFU) spectrographs, we previously analysed in details the kinematics, morphology and chemical abundance of the ISM and their relation with the ongoing star formation activity in several individual galaxies of the M81 group: VII Zw 403 (Lozinskaya et al 2006;Arkhipova et al 2007;Egorov & Lozinskaya 2011), IC 2574 (Egorov et al 2014), Holmberg I (Egorov et al 2018), Holmberg II (Egorov et al 2013;Wiebe et al 2014;Egorov et al 2017), NGC 3077 (Oparin et al 2020). All these galaxies are gas rich and reveal extended complexes of star formation with prominent feedback-driven superbubbles, and in most of them the long duration of star formation activity led to the creation of so called supergiant shells (SGS), having sizes up to 2 kpc, the interaction of which could be a driver of star formation propagation (Egorov et al 2017;Vasiliev et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%