2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star formation in a turbulent framework: from giant molecular clouds to protostars

Abstract: Turbulence is thought to be a primary driving force behind the early stages of star formation. In this framework large, self gravitating, turbulent clouds fragment into smaller clouds which in turn fragment into even smaller ones. At the end of this cascade we find the clouds which collapse into protostars. Following this process is extremely challenging numerically due to the large dynamical range, so in this paper we propose a semi analytic framework which is able to model star formation from the largest, gi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, this work emphasizes the usefulness of the w2PF (A17) to measure clump sizes in observed and simulated datasets and it demonstrates the power of the clump size scaling relation of F17 to diagnose in-situ clump formation via VDIs. This parallels recent developments on spatial correlations of star-forming disks on scales larger than clumps (Combes et al 2012;Hopkins 2012;Grasha et al 2017), as well as within individual clumps (Guszejnov & Hopkins 2016). Spatial correlations can therefore be regarded as an essential modern tool for studying the physics of star-forming disks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Overall, this work emphasizes the usefulness of the w2PF (A17) to measure clump sizes in observed and simulated datasets and it demonstrates the power of the clump size scaling relation of F17 to diagnose in-situ clump formation via VDIs. This parallels recent developments on spatial correlations of star-forming disks on scales larger than clumps (Combes et al 2012;Hopkins 2012;Grasha et al 2017), as well as within individual clumps (Guszejnov & Hopkins 2016). Spatial correlations can therefore be regarded as an essential modern tool for studying the physics of star-forming disks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…with power-law index ω. Observations and theory typically find values of β ≈ −4.. − 3 (Oey et al 2003, Guszejnov & Hopkins 2016 and ω ≈ 2.7..3 (Wisnioski et al 2012, Strömgren 1939).…”
Section: Gaussian Clumps With Power-law Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various theoretical models have been constructed to explain this (Padoan & Nordlund 2002;Mac Low & Klessen 2004;Hennebelle & Chabrier 2008; Hopkins 2012) based on gravoturbulent fragmentation of the host cloud. Radiative stellar feedback has been invoked to explain the precise shape of the IMF, using both simulations (e.g., Bate 2009) and analytic models (e.g., Guszejnov & Hopkins 2016). Early pioneering simulations of cluster formation approached the problem of producing a well-defined IMF (e.g., Bate et al 2003;Klessen et al 2008;Offner et al 2008), but were often limited in terms of statistics or resolution.…”
Section: The Imf and Sfe Of Molecular Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%