2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star Polymers Reduce Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Toxicity via Accelerated Amyloid Aggregation

Abstract: Protein aggregation into amyloid fibrils is a ubiquitous phenomenon across the spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders and type 2 diabetes. A common strategy against amyloidogenesis is to minimize the populations of toxic oligomers and protofibrils by inhibiting protein aggregation with small molecules or nanoparticles. However, melanin synthesis in nature is realized by accelerated protein fibrillation to circumvent accumulation of toxic intermediates. Accordingly, we designed and demonstrated the use of star… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23,[263][264][265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273] In recent years, it has been increasingly realized that, as with molecular inhibitors, the endpoint of amyloidosis mitigation with nanoparticles is not necessarily inhibition of protein fibrillization per se, but suppression of protein toxicity. Indeed, accelerated protein assembly may reduce the population of toxic oligomers and protofibrils, 253,274 analogous to Pmel17 aggregation in melanin synthesis in the skin. 275 However, no systematic understanding is currently available to predict whether an exogenous substance, nanoparticles included, inhibits or accelerates protein aggregation, and if accelerated protein aggregation leads to a beneficial or a detrimental effect on cell viability.…”
Section: Amyloidosis Mitigation In Vitro and In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,[263][264][265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273] In recent years, it has been increasingly realized that, as with molecular inhibitors, the endpoint of amyloidosis mitigation with nanoparticles is not necessarily inhibition of protein fibrillization per se, but suppression of protein toxicity. Indeed, accelerated protein assembly may reduce the population of toxic oligomers and protofibrils, 253,274 analogous to Pmel17 aggregation in melanin synthesis in the skin. 275 However, no systematic understanding is currently available to predict whether an exogenous substance, nanoparticles included, inhibits or accelerates protein aggregation, and if accelerated protein aggregation leads to a beneficial or a detrimental effect on cell viability.…”
Section: Amyloidosis Mitigation In Vitro and In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successive failures of small molecule compounds directs researchers to develop new antiamyloidogenic molecules such as polymers, peptoids, nanoparticles, molecular chaperones etc. [18][19][20] Among them, several polymers characterized by their ionic properties have been tested to investigate their activities on amyloidogenic aggregation. Notably, amine containing polymers, polyamino acids, cationic surfactants and cellular polyamines have been observed to modulate A aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, amine containing polymers, polyamino acids, cationic surfactants and cellular polyamines have been observed to modulate A aggregation. [21][22][23] Similarly, controlled aggregation kinetics and toxicity of hIAPP using starpolymers and polymer-nanodiscs have been studied recently 19,24 . Here we demonstrate the modulation of amyloid aggregation pathways for hIAPP and A40 using a polymethacrylate (PMAQA) derived copolymer ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The homopolymer brushes demonstrated water contact angles (WCA) of 61.9 ± 1.2°, comparable to literature data for PHEA brushes [ 74 ]. The chemical structure of the PHEA chains synthesized in solution ( Table 1 , entry 1) was confirmed by 1 H NMR ( Figure S8 ): δ (ppm) = 4.66–4.80 (1H, O H –, c), 3.89–4.07 (2H, –C H 2 –, a), 3.49–3.63 (2H, –C H 2 –, b), 2.14–2.38 (1H, –C H =, α), 1.34–1.90 (2H, –C H 2 –, β) [ 75 , 76 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%