1990
DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(90)90208-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star volume of marrow space and trabeculae in iliac crest: Sampling procedure and correlation to star volume of first lumbar vertebra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the biomedical setting, image analysis has been used extensively by investigators to examine trabecular bone microstructure from samples that are processed as thin sections (Amling et al, 1996;Compston et al, 1987;Croucher et al, 1996;Garrahan et al, 1986;Lundon et al, 1997;Thomsen et al, 2000;Vesterby, 1990), photographs of thick sections (Bergot et al, 1988;Twomey et al, 1983), computed tomography (CT) images (Gordon et al, 1998), and X-rays images (Geraets et al, 1990(Geraets et al, , 1993Grynpas et al, 1992Grynpas et al, , 1994. Although the different methods of obtaining images are not directly comparable, the different images provide similar information on trabecular structure, and each offers different advantages.…”
Section: Assessment Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the biomedical setting, image analysis has been used extensively by investigators to examine trabecular bone microstructure from samples that are processed as thin sections (Amling et al, 1996;Compston et al, 1987;Croucher et al, 1996;Garrahan et al, 1986;Lundon et al, 1997;Thomsen et al, 2000;Vesterby, 1990), photographs of thick sections (Bergot et al, 1988;Twomey et al, 1983), computed tomography (CT) images (Gordon et al, 1998), and X-rays images (Geraets et al, 1990(Geraets et al, , 1993Grynpas et al, 1992Grynpas et al, , 1994. Although the different methods of obtaining images are not directly comparable, the different images provide similar information on trabecular structure, and each offers different advantages.…”
Section: Assessment Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static histomorphometry was performed by custom-made software, which has previously been described in details [18]. The following parameters were measured: 2D trabecular bone volume BV/TV 2D ; marrow and bone space star volume V * m.space and V * b.space [19]; trabecular thickness Tb.Th, trabecular number Tb.N, and trabecular separation Tb.Sp [20]; node-terminus ratio Nd/Tm [21]; trabecular bone pattern factor TBPf [22]; and connectivity density CD [23]. For every analyzed section, a 2D region of interest (ROI) was selected to match its corresponding 3D VOI, which is chosen as described in Section 3.1.…”
Section: Histomorphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used standardized volumes of interest (VOI) in order to compare the structure of different biopsies, performed quantitative assessments, and made comparisons of the bone architecture as well as of the amount of bone material from different tibia biopsies. In order to justify the approach, the measures of complexity of the bone architecture were compared with the results of traditional 2D bone histomorphometry [17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, various measuring techniques are described to determine the amount of new bone formation and bone metabolism in general [Eriksen 1986;Charles et al, 1987;Parfitt et al, 1987;Vesterby, 1990]. Digital CT and X-ray images or histological sections are frequently used to quantify the amount of bone formation [Mohr et al, 2003;Shinkai et al, 2004;Rawlinson et al, 2005] Image Solutions IMSOL, Standish, Wigan (UK), Image Science Software, Berlin (Germany) and Imagic Bildverarbeitung, Glattbrugg (Switzerland)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%