2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2008.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STARPro — A new multithreaded direct execution platform for Esterel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first reactive processor, called REFLIX, was designed by Salcic et al [2002], followed by a number of follow-up designs [Yuan et al 2009]. This concept of reactive processors was then adapted to PRET-C with the ARPRET platform (Auckland Reactive PRET).…”
Section: Instruction Set Architectures For Synchronous Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reactive processor, called REFLIX, was designed by Salcic et al [2002], followed by a number of follow-up designs [Yuan et al 2009]. This concept of reactive processors was then adapted to PRET-C with the ARPRET platform (Auckland Reactive PRET).…”
Section: Instruction Set Architectures For Synchronous Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee predictability, all instructions and data are stored in on-chip memory. Any read/write operation takes only one clock cycle, simplifying the problem of PFU is inspired by the STARPro processor [20], which stores multiple thread preemption contexts for executing Esterel. STARPro's hardware only allows upto four levels of nested preemptions per thread and it preallocates the hardware for each thread.…”
Section: Arpret Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been various proposals on how to support concurrency in reactive processing, including sequentialization, parallel execution, and, most recently, multi-threading [26], [27], [28]. The latter one appears to be the most effective at this point, and significantly outperforms classical softwarebased execution strategies while using minimal resources.…”
Section: Synchronicity and Timing Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%