2022
DOI: 10.1093/biomethods/bpac020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STArS (STrain-Amplicon-Seq), a targeted nanopore sequencing workflow for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics and genotyping

Abstract: Diagnostic tests based on RT-qPCR are the gold standard approach to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection from clinical specimens. However, unless specifically optimized, this method is usually unable to recognize the specific viral strain responsible of COVID-19, a crucial information that is proving increasingly important in relation to virus spread and treatment effectiveness. Even if some RT-qPCR commercial assays are currently being developed for the detection of viral strains, they focus only on single/few genetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanopore platform classified 10 out of 14 samples as Apicomplexa positive, according to a scoring rule we developed, which classifies a sample as Apicomplexa positive in case the number of reads assigned to Apicomplexa is at least 5-fold the average number of reads assigned to Apicomplexa for negative controls. This scoring rule was adapted from previous works describing the adoption of Nanopore sequencing for pathogen detection [29,30], while the Illumina platform classified all 14 samples as Apicomplexa positive. In particular, the four samples classified as Apicomplexa negative by the Nanopore platform had a very low percentage of reads assigned to Apicomplexa also in the Illumina analysis, namely 0.22%, 0.09%, 0.04%, and 0.02% for the G0159P, G0173CR, G0173L, and G0225CR1 samples, respectively.…”
Section: Taxonomy Assignment and Platforms Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanopore platform classified 10 out of 14 samples as Apicomplexa positive, according to a scoring rule we developed, which classifies a sample as Apicomplexa positive in case the number of reads assigned to Apicomplexa is at least 5-fold the average number of reads assigned to Apicomplexa for negative controls. This scoring rule was adapted from previous works describing the adoption of Nanopore sequencing for pathogen detection [29,30], while the Illumina platform classified all 14 samples as Apicomplexa positive. In particular, the four samples classified as Apicomplexa negative by the Nanopore platform had a very low percentage of reads assigned to Apicomplexa also in the Illumina analysis, namely 0.22%, 0.09%, 0.04%, and 0.02% for the G0159P, G0173CR, G0173L, and G0225CR1 samples, respectively.…”
Section: Taxonomy Assignment and Platforms Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%