2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Startle response of captive North Sea fish species to underwater tones between 0.1 and 64kHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deimatic display is usually observed in experiments involving visual stimuli (Langridge, 2009;Mather, 2010;Staudinger et al, 2011); it is considered a threat (or startle) display to deter potential predators (Staudinger et al, 2013) and is defined by a flattened body shape, paling of the skin, the presence of paired, dark mantle spots, a dark fin line, dark eye rings and a dilation of the pupil (Hanlon and Messenger, 1988;Hanlon and Messenger, 1996). The startle response has been described for several taxa, mostly vertebrates and insects (Hoy et al, 1989;Pilz and Schnitzler, 1996;Koch, 1999;Kastelein et al, 2008) and is provoked by an intense and unexpected stimulus, has a short delay, and involves a fast motor response including escape responses and subtler movement such as eye blinks (Hoy et al, 1989;Koch, 1999;Götz and Janik, 2011). Based on these descriptions of the startle response, we defined one of the responses in S. officinalis as a startle response.…”
Section: Scoring Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deimatic display is usually observed in experiments involving visual stimuli (Langridge, 2009;Mather, 2010;Staudinger et al, 2011); it is considered a threat (or startle) display to deter potential predators (Staudinger et al, 2013) and is defined by a flattened body shape, paling of the skin, the presence of paired, dark mantle spots, a dark fin line, dark eye rings and a dilation of the pupil (Hanlon and Messenger, 1988;Hanlon and Messenger, 1996). The startle response has been described for several taxa, mostly vertebrates and insects (Hoy et al, 1989;Pilz and Schnitzler, 1996;Koch, 1999;Kastelein et al, 2008) and is provoked by an intense and unexpected stimulus, has a short delay, and involves a fast motor response including escape responses and subtler movement such as eye blinks (Hoy et al, 1989;Koch, 1999;Götz and Janik, 2011). Based on these descriptions of the startle response, we defined one of the responses in S. officinalis as a startle response.…”
Section: Scoring Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical swimming was either upwards, downwards or horizontally. Overall response were categorized as no reaction (no detected change in behavior), startle response [body flexion and 1 to 2 s of faster swimming (Blaxter et al, 1981;Kastelein et al, 2008)], avoidance (slow schooling, and diving or horizontal swimming away from the source, or alarm (rapid schooling and diving).…”
Section: Optical Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the Firth provides nursery sites for sand eels, an ecologically important species for predators that include sea birds and seals. The behavioural response to the noise generated to a tidal energy device will be species specific [57] and could have important consequences on the location of any device. Furthermore, electromagnetic fields associated with a tidal energy device and cable networks could influence the behavioural response of individual species [44].…”
Section: Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%