1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1976.tb01640.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Starvation and the size structure of zooplankton communities*

Abstract: The survival time of zooplanktan under conditions of total starvation Is expressed as a function of weightspecific respiration rate and the fraction of initial (pre-starvation) body weight which may be lost prior to death. Data from the literature on these two components of survival time are used to formulate a general expression of survivorship of zooplankton at 20°C as a ftmction of body weight: t=2-95 w°-^^, where t is in days and w is [ig dry weight. Survival time data from the literature on 25 marine and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
1
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
97
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are thus proportional to volume 1/3 . Threlkeld [921] found a scaling exponent of 1/4, but 1/3 also fits the data well.…”
Section: Starvationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…They are thus proportional to volume 1/3 . Threlkeld [921] found a scaling exponent of 1/4, but 1/3 also fits the data well.…”
Section: Starvationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2B). Smaller newborns have a lower resistance to starvation (Threlkeld 1976), and hence the competitive abilities of these animals would be lower (e.g. Gliwicz and Lampert 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bradley et al, 1991;Ebert & Yampolsky, 1993;Stibor, 1995). This means that the timelag between the determination of the weight of the offspring and their release from the broodchamber is 1.6 instar durations, typically around 5.5 days at 20 C. Larger offspring have higher starvation resistance (Threlkeld, 1976;Tessier et al, 1983), and as a result of the shape of the curves relating parental fitness with effort per offspring (see also Smith & Fretwell, 1974), the parental fitness loss of producing offspring which are slightly heavier than would be optimal is much lower than the fitness loss associated with the production of offspring which are slightly lighter than the optimal weight. As the likelihood of deteriorating food conditions is obviously greater at high than at low food levels, the advantage of producing larger-thanoptimal-sized offspring is also larger under high food conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%