2020
DOI: 10.5432/ijshs.201935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Anxiety and Low-Frequency Heart Rate Variability in High-Level Amateur Golfers While Putting under Pressure

Abstract: The present study investigated the relationship between psychophysiological state and clutch or choking performance during golf putting under pressure. Ten males and 13 females who were high-level competitive amateur golfers performed 25 putts under control and pressure conditions. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y1 (STAI-Y1), heart rate variability (HRV), and putting scores were measured. Participants whose performance improved under the pressure condition compared to the control condition were defined as clutc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This number is slightly lower than that reported in the present study using a test–retest approach, and it should be considered that the scale of measurement of Schweizer et al is continuous and therefore more sensitive to changes than our 0–3 score scale 17 . Nevertheless, test–retest studies could increase the variability of putts since subjects’ conditions can differ from one day to another due to several factors (e.g., sleep quality) 29 , 30 . Thus, in our opinion, this protocol can be more appropriate for performing reliability recommendations for putting performance measurements than just reliability analysis within a unique experimental session.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This number is slightly lower than that reported in the present study using a test–retest approach, and it should be considered that the scale of measurement of Schweizer et al is continuous and therefore more sensitive to changes than our 0–3 score scale 17 . Nevertheless, test–retest studies could increase the variability of putts since subjects’ conditions can differ from one day to another due to several factors (e.g., sleep quality) 29 , 30 . Thus, in our opinion, this protocol can be more appropriate for performing reliability recommendations for putting performance measurements than just reliability analysis within a unique experimental session.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%