“…The small90 benchmark: In Fig. 7, we further show the precision and success plots of 30 state-of-the-art trackers including SiamRPN [29] [30], LDES [31], SAT [32], TLD [3], LCT [33], OCT [22], CSK [34], CT [35], STC [36], KCF [37], ECO [38], MDNet [39], LCCF [40], SRDCF [41] and CPF [42], generated by the benchmark toolbox. While several baseline algorithms, e.g., LDES, DaSiamRPN, ECO, have shown promising potential in tracking small objects, our AST still helps achieve the precision rates of 84.9% (LDES AST), 83.1% (DaSiamRPN AST), 83.2% (ECO AST) which improve its counterpart base trackers by 1.6%, 0.9%, 1.7% respectively.…”