1981
DOI: 10.2172/5801538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State background-radiation levels: results of measurements taken during 1975-1979

Abstract: Location of background soil samples and external gamma-ray exposure rate measurements in the United States Location of background samples and external gamma-ray exposure rate measurements in Alabama 15 3 Location of background samples and external gamma-ray gure Page 32 Location of background samples and external gamma-ray exposure rate measurements in West Virginia 80 33 Location of background samples and external gamma-ray exposure rate measurements in Wyoming 82 34 External gamma-ray exposure rates at 1 m a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The normal back ground radiation levels for the northern New Jersey area are presented in Ta ble 2. 4,5 These data are provided for comparison with survey results presented in this report. All direct measurement results presented in this report are gross readings; background radiation levels have not been subtracted.…”
Section: Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 The normal back ground radiation levels for the northern New Jersey area are presented in Ta ble 2. 4,5 These data are provided for comparison with survey results presented in this report. All direct measurement results presented in this report are gross readings; background radiation levels have not been subtracted.…”
Section: Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 The normal back ground radiation leveL for the northern New Jersey area are presented in Table 2. 4 These data are provided for comparison with survey results presented in this re port. All direct measurement results presented in this report are gross readings; background radiation levels have not been subtracted.…”
Section: Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1 The normal background radiation levels for the northern New Jersey area are presented in Table 2. 4 These data 3 are provided for comparison with survey results presented in this section. All direct meas urement results presented in this report are gross readings: background radiation levels have not been subtracted.…”
Section: Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%