2017
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0179-17.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking

Abstract: To accurately estimate the state of the body, the nervous system needs to account for delays between signals from different sensory modalities. To investigate how such delays may be represented in the sensorimotor system, we asked human participants to play a virtual pong game in which the movement of the virtual paddle was delayed with respect to their hand movement. We tested the representation of this new mapping between the hand and the delayed paddle by examining transfer of adaptation to blind reaching a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that adaptation of movements to a novel walking situation results in the recalibration of internal representations for predictive control of locomotion; which are expressed as robust after-effects in temporal and spatial movement features. This is consistent with the idea that the motor system forms internal representations of space (Marigold and Drew, 2017) and time (Avraham et al, 2017; Breska and Ivry, 2018; Drew and Marigold, 2015) for predictive motor control. Several behavioral studies suggest separate recalibration of these internal representations of space and time in locomotion because spatial and timing measures exhibit different adaptation rates in the mature motor system (Malone and Bastian, 2010; Darmohray et al, 2019) throughout development (Vasudevan et al, 2011; Patrick et al, 2014) or healthy aging (Sombric et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We find that adaptation of movements to a novel walking situation results in the recalibration of internal representations for predictive control of locomotion; which are expressed as robust after-effects in temporal and spatial movement features. This is consistent with the idea that the motor system forms internal representations of space (Marigold and Drew, 2017) and time (Avraham et al, 2017; Breska and Ivry, 2018; Drew and Marigold, 2015) for predictive motor control. Several behavioral studies suggest separate recalibration of these internal representations of space and time in locomotion because spatial and timing measures exhibit different adaptation rates in the mature motor system (Malone and Bastian, 2010; Darmohray et al, 2019) throughout development (Vasudevan et al, 2011; Patrick et al, 2014) or healthy aging (Sombric et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Time delays are a result of sensory information transmission and processing time, and they may vary between modalities (Hopfield, 1995 ). Previous studies investigated how the sensorimotor system compensates for differences in the spatial representations between the left and right workspaces (Heilman and Valenstein, 1979 ; Ziemann and Hallett, 2001 ; Koch et al, 2011 ), and for the delays between the different modalities (Miall et al, 1985 ; Miall and Jackson, 2006 ; Pressman et al, 2007 ; Di Luca et al, 2011 ; Nisky et al, 2011 ; Honda et al, 2012 ; Rohde et al, 2014 ; Avraham et al, 2017a ; Farshchian et al, 2018 ). In this study, we use adaptation and transfer of adaptation paradigms to examine the interplay between these two compensatory processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of our study, even though the task scenes were completely different (mobile vs. static targets), the transfer of an internal model for a common distortion was detected; the latter suggests less sensibility to the changes in the environment for the adapted internal model. This kind of inter‐task transference has been recently documented (Avraham et al., ) and suggests a predominance of the intrinsic frame of reference (hand‐cursor coupling) over the extrinsic one (position of target in the scene) in the visuomotor remapping process, without ruling out the influence of the environment in the adaptation of limb internal models (Brayanov, Press, & Smith, ; Poh, Carroll, & de Rugy, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%