2020
DOI: 10.3390/admsci10020033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Capacity and Tolerance towards Tax Evasion: First Evidence from Romania

Abstract: We investigate the level of tolerance towards tax non-compliance and the informal economy in Romania, using a sample of 250 respondents. This variable is determined by a complex set of latent variables that include, but is not limited to, state capacity, social and business norms, the perception of non-compliance, and the perception of distributive justice. We find that our respondents are intolerant towards tax evasion and the informal economy, but the level of intolerance is relatively mild. Using a partial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our empirical model is highly parsimonious and indicates three major influences (from an initial list of 13 variables from the WVS dataset) that can predict bribery tolerance with a 91.69% accuracy of classification: the attitude towards cheating on taxes, the attitude towards claiming government benefits to which a person is not entitled, and the attitude towards violence against other people. The first two individual attitudes reflect upon people's relationship with the state and are considered "the usual suspects" for actual participation in corrupt practices in numerous studies conducted in transition [38,39] and developing economies [40]. Thus, our findings align with the literature for the narrower case of bribery tolerance and they further expand their predictive validity by covering a much larger spectrum of 105 worldwide countries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our empirical model is highly parsimonious and indicates three major influences (from an initial list of 13 variables from the WVS dataset) that can predict bribery tolerance with a 91.69% accuracy of classification: the attitude towards cheating on taxes, the attitude towards claiming government benefits to which a person is not entitled, and the attitude towards violence against other people. The first two individual attitudes reflect upon people's relationship with the state and are considered "the usual suspects" for actual participation in corrupt practices in numerous studies conducted in transition [38,39] and developing economies [40]. Thus, our findings align with the literature for the narrower case of bribery tolerance and they further expand their predictive validity by covering a much larger spectrum of 105 worldwide countries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…When this asymmetry is greater, tax morale is lower and tax non-compliance is higher (Alm et al 2010;Torgler 2007Torgler , 2011. This finding that tax non-compliance is greater when there is a lower level of vertical trust has been revealed in individual country studies (Vâlsan et al 2020;Williams and Franic 2016;Windebank and Horodnic 2017), studies of different European regions (Williams and Horodnic 2017b) and in the EU as a whole (Williams and Horodnic 2017a;. To tackle tax non-compliance, the goal is consequently to increase vertical trust to improve the willingness of the population to comply and self-regulate (Kirchler 2007;Torgler 2007Torgler , 2011.…”
Section: Voluntary Compliance: Social Actor Theorymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, understanding the motivation for compliance in this particular case also confirms the limits of the rational actor approach, as suggested in the literature review section, revealing the stringent need to build and strengthen trust and social capital. This aspect is reinforced by recent research pointing to the fact that the perceptions of a weak state capacity, respectively of lack of distributive justice, are factors that enhance the level of tolerance towards tax evasion and informal economy practices (Vâlsan et al, 2020). More so, peer effects expressed as neighbours' behaviour have been shown to positively impact tax compliance (Alm et al, 2017), setting an important precedent for even more visible changes, like in the case of improving building facades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%