2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45526-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Complexity of Basic Operations on Finite Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Câmpeanu et al [3] studied the state complexity of the concatenation of a mstate complete DFA with a n-state complete DFA over an alphabet of size k and proposed the upper bound…”
Section: Concatenationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Câmpeanu et al [3] studied the state complexity of the concatenation of a mstate complete DFA with a n-state complete DFA over an alphabet of size k and proposed the upper bound…”
Section: Concatenationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we give tight upper bounds for the transition complexity of all the above operations. We correct the upper bound for the state complexity of concatenation [3], and show that if the right automaton is larger than the left one, the upper bound is only reached using an alphabet of variable size. Note that, the difference between the state complexity for non necessarily complete DFAs and for complete DFAs is at most one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More precisely, for every integer h ≥ 3, they gave a language X h of length Θ(h 2 ), containing Θ(h) words, whose state complexity is Θ(h2 h ). Using another measure on finite sets of words, Campeanu, Culik, Salomaa and Yu proved in [3,4] that if the set X is a finite language over an alphabet of at least three letters having state complexity n ≥ 4, the state complexity of X * is 2 n−3 + 2 n−4 in the worst case. In addition when X is not necessarily finite, the state complexity of X * is 2 n−1 + 2 n−2 in the worst case [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic is intensively studied since almost the beginning of automata theory (see [1][2][3][4] for recent results). Researchers are mainly interested in automata that represent natural subclasses of regular languages such as finite languages [5] or prefix-free regular languages [6]. Most articles focus on the worst case state complexity of basic regular operations such as set constructions, concatenation, Kleene star and reversal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%