2008
DOI: 10.1097/hpc.0b013e3181752c44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Consensus Guideline for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Primary Care Settings

Abstract: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States and is often attributable to poorly controlled yet modifiable risk factors. All national guidelines strongly recommend performing global CVD risk assessments to inform therapeutic intensity, but only a minority of clinicians regularly quantitate their patient's CVD risk. Not surprisingly, many patients are not at goal with regard to blood pressure, lipids, and the appropriate receipt of antiplatelet therapy. Given this background, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach to creating the algorithm was based on our previous work forming clinical pathways in cardiology for the management of atherosclerotic heart disease and heart failure. 14,15 By intent, we formed a multidisciplinary expert panel to develop a simple process inclusive of relevant specialists to design a clinical algorithm to address this unmet need. The panel consisted of noninvasive cardiologists, interventional and electrophysiology subspecialists, an emergency medicine physician, and 2 internists from our hospital medicine division.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach to creating the algorithm was based on our previous work forming clinical pathways in cardiology for the management of atherosclerotic heart disease and heart failure. 14,15 By intent, we formed a multidisciplinary expert panel to develop a simple process inclusive of relevant specialists to design a clinical algorithm to address this unmet need. The panel consisted of noninvasive cardiologists, interventional and electrophysiology subspecialists, an emergency medicine physician, and 2 internists from our hospital medicine division.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%