2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.205312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State counting for excited bands of the fractional quantum Hall effect: Exclusion rules for bound excitons

Abstract: Exact diagonalization studies have revealed that the energy spectrum of interacting electrons in the lowest Landau level splits, nonperturbatively, into bands, which is responsible for the fascinating phenomenology of this system. The theory of nearly free composite fermions has been shown to be valid for the lowest band, and thus to capture the low-temperature physics, but it overpredicts the number of states for the excited bands. We explain the state counting of higher bands in terms of composite fermions w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed comparisons have been carried out for activations gaps 5 , collective mode dispersions 6 , and spin-polarization phase transitions 3 . In all cases, the measured numbers are generally consistent with those predicted by theory, but the agreement is worse than that suggested by the accuracy of the theory as determined from comparisons with exact diagonalization results 3,[7][8][9] . It is believed that the deviation arises from corrections due to effects extraneous to the FQHE physics, such as finite quantum well width, Landau level (LL) mixing and disorder, which are substantial and hard to deal with in a quantitative manner.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Detailed comparisons have been carried out for activations gaps 5 , collective mode dispersions 6 , and spin-polarization phase transitions 3 . In all cases, the measured numbers are generally consistent with those predicted by theory, but the agreement is worse than that suggested by the accuracy of the theory as determined from comparisons with exact diagonalization results 3,[7][8][9] . It is believed that the deviation arises from corrections due to effects extraneous to the FQHE physics, such as finite quantum well width, Landau level (LL) mixing and disorder, which are substantial and hard to deal with in a quantitative manner.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The trial wave functions given by the CF theory are not very accurate quantitatively for the 7/3 ground state and excitations (see, e.g., Ref. 43), but are the best available model that can be dealt with in a simple manner. We find that, within this model, the edge of the 7/3 state is also reconstructed for d 0.5 B .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, their low-energy excitations are obtained by exciting composite fermions across ΛLs 24,36,70 . Our motivation for investigating the excitations comes from the fact that spin reversed excitations of composite fermions can reveal an instability of the fully polarized ground state at sufficiently small Zeeman energies.…”
Section: Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%