2020
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.523866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Dependent Gain Modulation of Spinal Motor Output

Abstract: Afferent somatosensory information plays a crucial role in modulating efferent motor output. A better understanding of this sensorimotor interplay may inform the design of neurorehabilitation interfaces. Current neurotechnological approaches that address motor restoration after trauma or stroke combine motor imagery (MI) and contingent somatosensory feedback, e.g., via peripheral stimulation, to induce corticospinal reorganization. These interventions may, however, change the motor output already at the spinal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MI results in sensorimotor desynchronization of alpha and beta oscillations ( Fadiga et al, 1999 ; Pfurtscheller et al, 2006 ) and has a top-down influence on cortico-spinal excitability ( Oishi et al, 1994 ; Li et al, 2004 ; Aoyama and Kaneko, 2011 ). Using MI to modulate the sensorimotor brain state, state-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and PES has been demonstrated for the motor system ( Kraus et al, 2016a , b , 2018 ; Guggenberger et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Ziegler et al, 2019 ). Stimulation applied concurrently with MI enhanced the modulation of corticospinal excitability, as reflected by an increase of the amplitude of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) ( Saito et al, 2013 ; Kaneko et al, 2014 ; Kraus et al, 2016a , b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI results in sensorimotor desynchronization of alpha and beta oscillations ( Fadiga et al, 1999 ; Pfurtscheller et al, 2006 ) and has a top-down influence on cortico-spinal excitability ( Oishi et al, 1994 ; Li et al, 2004 ; Aoyama and Kaneko, 2011 ). Using MI to modulate the sensorimotor brain state, state-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and PES has been demonstrated for the motor system ( Kraus et al, 2016a , b , 2018 ; Guggenberger et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Ziegler et al, 2019 ). Stimulation applied concurrently with MI enhanced the modulation of corticospinal excitability, as reflected by an increase of the amplitude of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) ( Saito et al, 2013 ; Kaneko et al, 2014 ; Kraus et al, 2016a , b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%