2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.010502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Exchange with Quantum Side Information

Abstract: We consider a quantum communication task between two users Alice and Bob, in which Alice and Bob exchange their respective quantum information by means of local operations and classical communication assisted by shared entanglement. Here, we assume that Alice and Bob may have quantum side information, not transferred, and classical communication is free. In this work, we derive general upper and lower bounds for the least amount of entanglement which is necessary to perfectly perform this task, called the stat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our qubit-commitment scheme, satisfying general security criteria while preserving coherence of the committed quantum state, has broad applications in the upcoming era of quantum network [38]. One example could be an implementation of a fair version of quantum state exchange [39,40]. If two quantum computers are demanded to generate certain quantum states independently and to be cross-checked afterward [41], one computer should not acquire the other's output state before generating its state.…”
Section: Shared Randomness Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our qubit-commitment scheme, satisfying general security criteria while preserving coherence of the committed quantum state, has broad applications in the upcoming era of quantum network [38]. One example could be an implementation of a fair version of quantum state exchange [39,40]. If two quantum computers are demanded to generate certain quantum states independently and to be cross-checked afterward [41], one computer should not acquire the other's output state before generating its state.…”
Section: Shared Randomness Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14]. It was found that the quantum qubit commitment has some unique applications [15] beyond quantum bit commitment in the upcoming era of quantum network, including implementing a fair version of quantum state exchange [16] and preventing cheating in such a task that two quantum computers are demanded to generate certain quantum states independently and to be cross-checked afterward [17], in which one computer may try to delay to generate its state after the other party and cheat by learning from the other party's state or even try to imperfectly clone the state to pretend to have high computational power. It was also pointed out [15] that secure quantum qubit commitment can break asynchronous quantum network assumption since it can effectively activate multiple quantum machines at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction.-In quantum information theory, the quantum state exchange [1,2] is a quantum communication task, in which two users, Alice and Bob, exchange their quantum information by means of local operations and classical communication (LOCC) assisted by shared entanglement. A main research aim in the study of the quantum state exchange is to evaluate the least amount of entanglement needed for the task, as in other quantum communication tasks, such as quantum state merging [3,4] and quantum state redistribution [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We formally define the OSQSE and its optimal entanglement cost, and derive computable lower bounds on the latter, which in turn yield bounds for the asymptotic quantum state exchange [1,2]. In addition, we provide two useful conditions to decide whether a given initial state enables OSQSE with zero entanglement cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation