2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2017.8264278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State feedback controller sparsification via a notion of non-fragility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…wherein f K (K) and f L (L) denote Gamma PDFs for K and L, respectively. Also, we calculate the double integral bounds in (14) via Assumption 1 which is equivalent to the following inequalities:…”
Section: Probabilistic Robust Non-fragile Tuning Of a Pd Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…wherein f K (K) and f L (L) denote Gamma PDFs for K and L, respectively. Also, we calculate the double integral bounds in (14) via Assumption 1 which is equivalent to the following inequalities:…”
Section: Probabilistic Robust Non-fragile Tuning Of a Pd Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-fragility concept has been utilized in state-feedback controller sparsification as well. [14][15][16] Moreover, it has been utilized in order reduction of LTI controllers. 17 Most of the existing tuning methods are deterministic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sparse control design in such cases must also be robust against the uncertainties. Robust designs have been reported in several recent papers such as [7]- [10] using H ∞ control, which is suitable for handling norm-bounded uncertainties in the system dynamics. In particular, [8], [9] employ both H 2 and H ∞ control, thus balancing the H 2 performance of the nominal system and robustness objective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%