2016
DOI: 10.26522/ssj.v9i2.1130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Funded Activism: Lessons from Civil Society Organizations in Ireland

Abstract: Civil society organizations (CSOs) in Ireland receive significant state funding and institutional support according to the logic that they are important contributors to democratic governance, with the effect that the CSO sector has expanded and become more embedded in formal decision-making processes over the past several decades. At the same time, dependency on government funding exposes CSOs to three important challenges: to stay true to activist mandates in the face of pressure from state funders to focus o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the potential for cooperation is strongly linked to the level of democratic opening within the country (Atack;; cooperative relationships are shaped by the history of interactions, the nature of NGOs in terms of capacity and resources and the extent to which the interactions are formally or informally organized (Mcloughlin, 2011). While supporting the need for cooperative relationships, other authors warn of potential dangers of becoming too close to state such as lose of independence and inability to lead advocacy activities (Visser, 2015;Kim, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the potential for cooperation is strongly linked to the level of democratic opening within the country (Atack;; cooperative relationships are shaped by the history of interactions, the nature of NGOs in terms of capacity and resources and the extent to which the interactions are formally or informally organized (Mcloughlin, 2011). While supporting the need for cooperative relationships, other authors warn of potential dangers of becoming too close to state such as lose of independence and inability to lead advocacy activities (Visser, 2015;Kim, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%