2015
DOI: 10.2172/1170354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Level Comparison of Processes and Timelines for Distributed Photovoltaic Interconnection in the United States

Abstract: NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variable state and local U.S regulations may impact PV system equipment reuse applications and investment in secondary PV markets (Section 3). Most interconnection fire, building, and electric regulations in the United States vary by jurisdiction and may directly prohibit the reuse of PV modules and/or BOS equipment in certain secondary grid-tied and off-grid applications (CESA 2017;IEEE 2018;UL 2010;Lydic 2018;Ardani et al 2015;NFPA 2019;IBC 2012;Sherwood 2013;Solar ABCs 2011). 62 Variable regulations applicable to the reuse of PV system equipment may also make it difficult to determine viable secondary markets for PV system equipment, and the uncertainty may stifle consumer confidence in used or refurbished products and overall investment in the repair/reuse of PV system equipment.…”
Section: Repair/reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variable state and local U.S regulations may impact PV system equipment reuse applications and investment in secondary PV markets (Section 3). Most interconnection fire, building, and electric regulations in the United States vary by jurisdiction and may directly prohibit the reuse of PV modules and/or BOS equipment in certain secondary grid-tied and off-grid applications (CESA 2017;IEEE 2018;UL 2010;Lydic 2018;Ardani et al 2015;NFPA 2019;IBC 2012;Sherwood 2013;Solar ABCs 2011). 62 Variable regulations applicable to the reuse of PV system equipment may also make it difficult to determine viable secondary markets for PV system equipment, and the uncertainty may stifle consumer confidence in used or refurbished products and overall investment in the repair/reuse of PV system equipment.…”
Section: Repair/reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grid interconnection entails various compliance procedures and permits. The full interconnection process takes about 50 days for U.S. residential PV systems, but it varies significantly across states and local jurisdictions (Ardani et al 2015). Differences in local interconnection and other permitting requirements can significantly affect installation times and costs (Dong and Wiser 2013;Burkhardt et al 2015).…”
Section: Interconnection Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interconnection process often poses a sizable cost burden for distributed solar projects due to potentially complex impact studies, long processing times, and lack of certainty regarding approval. Ardani et al (2015) found that project delays due to interconnection are more common for the midscale projects than for smaller distributed PV projects (250 kW and under), with detailed impact study commonly required for any project greater than 1 MW. Customers and developers can consider downsizing projects to avoid the detailed study process, which can place financing at risk or incur high costs.…”
Section: Implications For Prospective Midmarket Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%