1986
DOI: 10.2307/976304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Lotteries as Fiscal Savior or Fiscal Fraud: A Look at the Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Lottery research has focused on several key areas. The variability of lottery revenue relative to other sources of state revenue has been examined and discussed by Mikesell & Zorn (1986), Clotfelter & Cook (1989) and Szakmary & Szakmary (1995). Studies by Thiel (1991), Quiggin (1991), Scoggins (1995) and Garrett & Sobel (1999) have all examined the optimal prize and odds structure of lottery games, optimal in terms of lottery revenue maximization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Lottery research has focused on several key areas. The variability of lottery revenue relative to other sources of state revenue has been examined and discussed by Mikesell & Zorn (1986), Clotfelter & Cook (1989) and Szakmary & Szakmary (1995). Studies by Thiel (1991), Quiggin (1991), Scoggins (1995) and Garrett & Sobel (1999) have all examined the optimal prize and odds structure of lottery games, optimal in terms of lottery revenue maximization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another indicator of lottery revenue potential is income per capita. Although it is well-documented that the poor spend a higher percentage of their income on lottery tickets than middle-to-high income individuals, the latter group spends a larger nominal amount (Mikesell and Zorn, 1986). Therefore, as income per capita increases, it is hypothesized that the revenue potential of a lottery also increases.…”
Section: Conceptual F Ramework: Motivati Ons For Adopti Onmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While both retail sale tax and VAT have the same broad tax base in theory, the VAT system does a better job of collecting revenue, since retail sales tax puts all tax eggs in one basket (e.g. the final stage) while VAT can collect at least some of it (Mikesell, 2007). Besides its revenue adequacy, VAT has another advantage in terms of its collectability.…”
Section: Vatmentioning
confidence: 99%