2005
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Mental Health Policy: Implementing a Multisource Outcome Assessment Protocol in a State Psychiatric Hospital: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has linked BPRS scores to clinical global impression ratings, with ‘mildly ill’ corresponding to a BPRS total score of 31, ‘moderately ill’ to a BPRS score of 41, and ‘markedly ill’ to a BPRS score of 53 (Leucht et al ., ). The BPRS has good inter‐rater reliability (intraclass correlations [ICC] = 0.85; Earnshaw, Rees, Dunn, & Burlingame, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has linked BPRS scores to clinical global impression ratings, with ‘mildly ill’ corresponding to a BPRS total score of 31, ‘moderately ill’ to a BPRS score of 41, and ‘markedly ill’ to a BPRS score of 53 (Leucht et al ., ). The BPRS has good inter‐rater reliability (intraclass correlations [ICC] = 0.85; Earnshaw, Rees, Dunn, & Burlingame, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified four factors underlying the BPRS each with acceptable internal consistency -Thought Disturbance, Animation, Mood Disturbance, and Apathy (Thomas, Donnell, & Young, 2004). Adequate inter-rater reliability has been demonstrated for the BPRS-E (Earnshaw, Rees, Dunn, & Burlinghame, 2005). Both total and subscale scores were used.…”
Section: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale -Extended (Bprs-e)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity to change of the Y-OQ with regard to each of these procedures has been reported elsewhere (Burlingame et al, 2001a;Mosier, Burlingame, Nebeker, & Wells, 1997), as was research related to determining sensitivity to change across individual clients or groups of clients undergoing mental health treatment and self-report and/or clinician-reported sources of outcome data (e.g. Earnshaw, Rees, Dunn, Burlingame, & Chen, 2005;Lambert, 2001;Lambert et al, 2001). 2 Two instruments commonly used in tracking outcome with youth are the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991) and Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised (CPRS-R; Conners, 1997) (Brown et al, 2001) led to the need for additional research to satisfy remaining criteria (see, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%