State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market

Abstract

The malleable penile implant is often considered an inferior device to the three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant. Nonetheless, the malleable prosthesis has its unique advantages such as lower cost, easier to perform and fewer mechanical complications than inflatable prostheses. Furthermore, its role can be extended to patients with issues relating to poor manual hand dexterity, those undergoing a salvage for infection prosthesis and as an emergency surgical measure in patients presenting with acute ischaemic priapism. Over the past few decades, there have been numerous design and technological advancements to improve overall clinical efficacy, mechanical durability, axial rigidity and device concealability of malleable penile prostheses. The following article provides a narrative review of the six major contemporary malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market, namely, the Coloplast Genesis prosthesis, the Boston Scientific Tactra prosthesis, the Zephyr ZSI 100 and 100 (female-to-male) FTM devices, the Rigi10 prosthesis, the TUBE malleable prosthesis and the Shah prosthesis and evaluates the published outcomes. Appropriate patient selection and strict counselling regarding what to expect with malleable prostheses coupled with adherence to safe surgical principles are paramount to ensure excellent clinical success and patient satisfaction rates.

Overcoming barriers to immediate penile implant salvage surgery: a narrative review

“…As such, the authors recommend stocking 2–3 MPPs to be adequately prepared for IS. Three brands of MPP, Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA), Coloplast (Minneapolis, MN, USA), and Rigicon (Ronkonkoma, NY, USA), are available in the US ( 31 ). Any of these brands may be used for MIST, but the relative frequency of their use for IS nationally has not been reported ( 12 , 32 ).…”